PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 29(3): 278-284
2009
© 2009 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Kuok, U.-I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Kuok, U.-I

PD IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD

A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING CONVENTIONAL SWAN-NECK STRAIGHT-TIP CATHETERS TO STRAIGHT-TIP CATHETERS WITH AN ARTIFICIAL SUBCUTANEOUS SWAN NECK

Chiu-Leong Li1,a, Tai-Gen Cui1,2,a, Hong-Bing Gan1,3, Kin Cheung1, Weng-In Lio1 and Un-I Kuok1

Renal Department,1 Centro Hospitalar Conde de São Januário, Macao SAR; Department of Nephrology,2 Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital University of Medical Science; Renal Division,3 Peking University First Hospital & Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, China

Correspondence to: U.I. Kuok, Renal Department, Centro Hospitalar Conde de São Januário, Macao SAR, China. kuokuni{at}ssm.gov.mo


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PERITONEAL CATHETER STUDY
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 

{diamondsuit} Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inserting a straight-tip Tenckhoff catheter configured with a subcutaneous artificial swan neck.

{diamondsuit} Design: Clinical outcomes of conventional swan-neck straight-tip catheters and Tenckhoff straight-tip catheters implanted with an artificial subcutaneous swan neck were compared in a prospective randomized controlled trial in a single-center setting.

{diamondsuit} Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion were randomized to receive either a double-cuff straight-tip Tenckhoff catheter with an artificial subcutaneous swan-neck (TC) or a conventional double-cuff straight-tip swan-neck catheter (SN). The primary outcome was catheter exit-site infection rate; the secondary outcomes were catheter-related mechanical events and surgery-related bleeding.

{diamondsuit} Results: A total of 39 consecutive patients were enrolled: 20 into the TC group and 19 into the SN group. More exit-site infections were observed in the SN group than in the TC group, although the difference was not statistically significant (0.97 vs 0.51 episodes per patient-year, p = 0.0657). However, there were more peritonitis episodes in the TC group than in the SN group (0.35 vs 0.15 episodes per patient-year, p = 0.0256). Exit-site and main wound bleeding post surgery were generally mild and similar in the 2 groups. No events of dialysate leakage, catheter tip migration, or subcutaneous cuff protrusion were observed in patients of either group. Outflow failure due to mechanical causes occurred in 2 patients in the TC group and in 1 patient in the SN group during the intermittent peritoneal dialysis period; all were corrected successfully by laparoscopic omentectomy.

{diamondsuit} Conclusions: Placement of the double-cuff straight-tip Tenckhoff catheter configured with an artificial subcutaneous swan neck appears to be an effective and safe procedure. It may be a good alternative to the conventional swan-neck catheter.

KEY WORDS: Peritoneal catheter; artificial swan neck; insertion; migration; exit-site infection.

The Macao Special Administrative Region (handed over to the People's Republic of China by Portugal on 20 December 1999) is located at the Pearl River Delta on the southeastern coast of Mainland China and is approximately 60 km southwest of Hong Kong (Figure 1). The territory, 29.2 km2 in area, consists of the Macao Peninsula, Taipa Island, and Coloane Island. The Macao Peninsula is connected to Taipa Island by three bridges and the two islands are connected by land reclamation. By the end of 2007, the population of Macao was 543 000. Macao has experienced a fast-growing economy over the past decade. The GDP per capita increased from US$14 649 in 1998 to US$36 357 in 2007. The weather in Macao is, in general, subtropical to temperate, with an average temperature of 23.1°C in 2006. It is humid and rainy in the spring and summer whereas, in the autumn and winter, relative humidity and rain-fall decrease.


Figure 1
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1 — Hong Kong and Macao.

 

The Centro Hospitalar Conde de São Januário is the only hospital in the territory providing peritoneal dialysis (PD) service. This hospital is also responsible for more than 99% of the hemodialysis (HD) patients in the region. By the end of 2007, there were 398 patients on chronic dialysis treatment in Macao; 75 patients were alive with a functioning kidney transplant. The total prevalence rate in 2007 was therefore about 871 patients per million population. The approximate incidence of end-stage renal disease in Macao is 138 patients per million population. Of the 398 chronic dialysis patients, 158 are on PD. This number includes 22 on automated PD and 7 on combined HD and PD. The PD penetration rate in Macao is therefore about 40%.

The funding system for end-stage renal disease in Macao is a bit different from Hong Kong, where dialysis (mainly PD) is free for all patients although they need to pay a small amount for accessories and the extra cost of some medications. In Macao, dialysis (both PD and HD) is free for patients in the following categories: pregnant women receiving pre- and postnatal care, children under 10 years of age, students, teachers, individuals with or suspected of having infectious diseases, drug addicts, patients with psychiatric diseases, patients with malignant tumors, prisoners, government service and missionary employees, individuals in danger of or living in poverty, and individuals over 65 year of age. The Macao SAR government pays all expenses, including the costs of dialysis and medication. Those patients that do not belong to the above categories are evaluated for their financial status by the Social Department. Almost all these patients can get free dialysis treatment eventually, while a few might be required to pay for their medications by themselves. Very few patients (<1%) need to pay all expenses. Medical insurance is not popular in Macao. There is no PD-first policy in Macao but patients are advised to start with PD if there are no contraindications.


    PERITONEAL CATHETER STUDY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PERITONEAL CATHETER STUDY
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
Catheter-related infectious and mechanical complications are common problems in PD patients and may result in catheter removal in severe cases (14). Vigorous efforts have been made to minimize these complications by advancing the design of peritoneal catheters and optimizing surgical and nonsurgical implantation techniques, but no unanimous recommendations have been given with respect to catheter type and placement method so far. Surgical implantation of the swan-neck double-cuff catheter has been advocated by some nephrologists due to lower migration rate and fewer episodes of exit-site infection (ESI) (1,36). Despite their higher rates of outflow failure due to catheter tip migration and ESI (13,5), double-cuff Tenckhoff catheters are still widely used in many PD centers because similarly good outcomes compared to swan-neck catheters can be achieved (1,2,4,5) and they are less expensive.

In recent years, a new approach has been explored in certain PD centers: an arcuate subcutaneous bend in the Tenckhoff catheter is created with either a tunneler or surgically (4,5,7). We have been using a similar method with certain modifications for peritoneal catheter implantation in Macao since 2002. It has been justified to be a good method to reduce ESI and catheter migration over the years, but no controlled study has been done. The current study was carried out to evaluate the method by comparing it to surgical implantation of swan-neck catheters.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PERITONEAL CATHETER STUDY
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
From May 2005 to January 2006, all consecutive patients entering the PD program in our center were recruited and randomized (according to a computer-generated randomizing chart) into either the double-cuff straight-tip Tenckhoff catheter with artificial subcutaneous swan neck (TC) group or the conventional, swan neck, double cuff, straight-tip catheter (SN) group. Although there was no research ethics committee in Macao at that time, all patients were informed and consent forms were signed. The original design of the study was to enroll at least 40 patients in each arm. No statistical power calculation was done. The first 20 swan-neck catheters ran out quickly because more patients than expected entered the PD program during that period and the other 20 swan-neck catheters could not be delivered to us until some months later. For this reason, the study was terminated early to avoid any unclear factors that could interfere with the final result.

Cefazolin 1 g was given intravenously for prophylaxis just before the operation. A nasal swab was taken before the antibiotic was administered. All patients showered and applied chlorhexidine to the proposed incision site on the evening prior to their surgery. All patients had repeat blood analysis before implantation. For those patients with low hemoglobin levels, blood transfusions were given to increase hemoglobin levels to 10 g/dL before the operation.

All catheter implantations were performed by the same group of 3 well-trained nephrologists using mini-laparotomy with a paramedian approach. Under local anesthesia, a primary 3 – 4 cm incision was made 1 – 2 cm from or just below umbilical level by dissecting the skin, subcutaneous tissue, rectus sheath, and muscle to expose the peritoneal membrane. A small opening was made in the peritoneum and the catheter was introduced into the opposite side of the pelvis using a semirigid blunt stylet. The peritoneum was then closed just below the level of the deep cuff using purse-string sutures; one more stitch was made on the deep cuff at 12 o'clock to allow tight fixation to the posterior rectus fascia/peritoneum. The deep cuff was buried in the rectus muscle and the anterior rectus fascia was closed using interrupted sutures in such a way to maintain cranial direction of the catheter. A second skin incision was made on the same side as the primary incision, approximately 1 – 2 cm laterally and 3 – 4 cm above the deep cuff. The catheter was brought out via the secondary incision with the assistance of a tunneler, then placed back via the same incision and directed caudally and parallel to the linea alba. A cutaneous exit was created by perforating the skin with a pointed tunneler. The exit site should be predetermined to allow approximately a 2-cm distance from the subcutaneous cuff. The intraperitoneal and subcutaneous/external segments of the TC were parallel and about 2 – 3 cm apart. The subcutaneous cuff was located on the same side of the cutaneous exit (Figure 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2 — Configuration of the artificial swan-neck catheter and direction of the exit site.

 
The swan-neck catheter was implanted in a similar way except that no secondary incision was made. Instead, a semicircular pointed tunneler was used to bring out the catheter right after closing the anterior rectus fascia. Blunt separation of the subcutaneous tissue with a hemostat was necessary to facilitate creation of subcutaneous tunnel. The cutaneous exit was also approximately 2 cm distant from the subcutaneous cuff.

The position of the catheter tip was checked by x-ray monitor during the operation and by abdominal x-ray immediately after implantation to ensure that it was in the pelvic cavity. Catheter function was tested for fill and drain with 20 mL normal saline immediately after closure of the peritoneum, and 500 – 1000 mL PD fluid after the catheter was pulled out via the exit site. Peritoneal membrane leakage was also checked and dealt with either by immediate surgical approach or by delayed commencement of intermittent peritoneal dialysis (IPD) after implantation.

Twice-weekly IPD (more frequent at the beginning for a patient who stating dialysis late with severe uremia syndrome) usually started immediately after implantation, except in those patients that were found to have peritoneal membrane leakage during the operation (usual delay was 1 – 2 weeks). Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) training was conducted at about 6 weeks after catheter implantation.

During the IPD period, a nephrologist and/or a renal nurse inspected the catheter whenever the patient arrived for IPD. Exit-site swab for culture was taken every week. We treated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas nasal carriers, even without symptoms or signs of infection. All acute infections and equivocal exit sites with positive cultures were treated. Pseudomonas infection was treated with two sensitive antibiotics for at least 21 days. All patients used chlorhexidine solution for exit-site care (8). Neither mupirocin nor gentamicin cream was applied to the nares or exit site as prophylactic treatment.

Patients were regularly seen by a renal nurse and/or nephrologists for inspection of their exit site and catheter function (every 4 – 8 weeks) thereafter during CAPD or continuous cycling PD. Acute ESI was defined as purulent or serous-like discharge with local pericatheter erythema and/or tenderness. A culture swab was taken from any exit-site discharge at each clinic follow-up. Outflow failure was defined as very poor drain and/or fill of PD fluid that made PD impossible to be carried out. Catheter tip migration was defined as x-ray documented change in catheter tip position from the pelvis to the abdominal cavity. It was usually accompanied by outflow failure that could not be resolved after rigorous catharsis using lactulose enemas and oral sorbitol over a 48-hour period. Peritonitis was defined as the presence of at least two of the following three conditions: symptoms and signs of peritoneal inflammation, cloudy peritoneal fluid with an elevated peritoneal fluid cell count, and demonstration of bacteria in the peritoneal effluent by Gram stain or culture.

The primary outcome was catheter ESI rate; secondary outcomes included peritonitis rate, catheter-related mechanical events, including catheter migration and outflow failure, and surgery-related bleeding. This study was not designed to detect a difference in these outcomes between the two groups. Patients were regularly followed for as long as possible after catheter implantation unless they withdrew from the PD program.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise specified. Unpaired t-tests were used for between-group comparisons; categorical variables were compared by chi-square analyses or Fisher's exact test in the intent-to-treat population, as appropriate. The incidences of infectious complications were compared using Poisson analysis. All statistical tests were two sided and significance was defined as p < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PERITONEAL CATHETER STUDY
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
From May 2005 to January 2006, 39 consecutive patients were randomized into TC (n = 20) group or SN (n = 19) group. Patients in the two groups were comparable with respect to percentage of patients with diabetes mellitus, baseline serum creatinine and albumin levels, and percentage of MRSA carriers (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Baseline Demography of Patients

 

The study was carried on until September 2007. Six patients in the TC group and 10 patients in the SN group withdrew from the study during the follow-up period (Figure 3). Total follow-up period was 31.8 patient-years for the TC group and 20.7 patient-years for the SN group.


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3 — Study flow chart.

 

Exit-site infections occurred in 10 patients in the TC group and in 10 patients in the SN group (50% vs 52.6%, p = 0.869) (Table 2). More ESI episodes were observed in the SN group than in the TC group but this did not reach statistical significance (0.97 vs 0.51 episodes/patient-year, p = 0.0657). The two MRSA nasal carriers did not develop ESI later during the IPD and CAPD periods. One of them had 1 episode of peritonitis later during CAPD with good recovery, but PD fluid culture showed negative results. No tunnel infection was observed in either group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Incidence of Exit-Site Infection (ESI) and Peritonitis

 

Six patients in the TC group developed peritonitis, compared with 3 patients in the SN group (incidence rate 30% vs 15.8%, p = 0.451). The number of peritonitis episodes was also higher in the TC group than in the SN group (0.35 vs 0.15 episodes/patient-year, p = 0.0256) (Table 2); however, this was due mainly to the fact that 1 female patient in the TC group had 5 episodes of peritonitis. She was later confirmed to have multiple colon diverticula and was switched to HD.

As for surgery-related bleeding, 9 patients in the SN group experienced wound bleeding, compared with only 5 patients in the TC group (p = 0.146); 13 patients in the SN group and 9 patients in the TC group experienced exitsite bleeding (p = 0.140). Most of the bleeding was mild. None of the patients in either group had severe bleeding (Table 3). Three patients developed outflow failure due to catheter problems (2 in the TC group and 1 in the SN group) during the IPD period (Table 3); all were successfully corrected by laparoscopic omentectomy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Wound/Exit-Site Bleeding and Catheter Function Post Implantation

 

No catheter tip migration was observed in either group and no subcutaneous cuff protrusion was found in either group during the study period.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PERITONEAL CATHETER STUDY
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
A well-functioning peritoneal catheter should allow adequate rates of fluid inflow and outflow and be of such a design as to minimize infection at the exit site and to allow for successful resolution of peritonitis should it occur. The downward exit site allows drainage of cutaneous secretions and, in case of infections, purulent secretions, making healing more likely and reducing the risk of secondary infections of the tunnel. This is of great significance especially in the warm and humid climates of Southeast Asia. Studies from Hong Kong (4) and Singapore (5) indeed showed that swan-neck catheters fared better than straight Tenckhoff catheters with respect to ESI. Even in the cold and dry climate of Finland, Eklund et al. (1) found that the probability of ESI was lower in patients with conventional swan-neck catheters, although this was not statistically significant.

The advantage of a downward exit site was realized long ago. In 1968, an arcuate tunnel that made both external segments and internal segments sit in a downward direction was proposed by Tenckhoff (7). However, there were concerns that the resilience force between the two cuffs of the straight Tenckhoff catheter might cause problems, such as catheter tip migration and outer cuff protrusion if a sharply arcuate subcutaneous bend was created. These concerns might be justifiable, as some studies did point out that catheter migration has occurred with Tenckhoff catheters with upward directed exit sites (1) and that, compared with SN, there have been more migrations of Tenckhoff catheters with even an obliquely downward exit site (4,5). Favazza et al. (7) used a semicircular tunneler to create a 180-degree subcutaneous arc bend in a straight Tenckhoff catheter, with the exit site directed vertically downwards. They reported similar ESI rates with this 180-degree bent Tenckhoff catheter and the conventional swan-neck catheter, but a higher migration rate than the swan-neck catheter. Moreover, in three cases from the above study, the arcuate tunnel straightened.

Modifications in implantation technique were made to overcome the adverse effects resulting from resilience forces in our study. The ascending and descending segments of the catheter were brought closer to each other and the subcutaneous cuff was located on the same side of the exit site. Therefore, a U-shaped catheter was created with two arms only 2 – 3 cm apart and with two cuffs residing in different arms. The stitch made on the deep cuff at 12 o'clock was imperative for tighter fixation of the catheter onto the posterior rectus fascia and maintaining the cranial direction.

All effort was made to minimize the resilience forces, keep the desired U-shaped configuration, and ultimately reduce ESI rate and prevent the catheter tip from migrating. The results of the current study indeed demonstrate that the practice is effective in preventing catheter tip migration. Savader et al. (9) showed that the majority (>50%) of radiology-confirmed catheter migrations occurred within 60 days of surgical placement and that 75% of these failures occurred within 270 days. No migration was observed in the study group for an average period of 16.2 months post-implantation in the current study.

The secondary incision was essential in facilitating the construction of a U-shaped subcutaneous tunnel during surgical implantation. More significant bleeding was anticipated with Tenckhoff catheters due to the extra incision. However, both wound and exit-site bleeding were actually less with TC than SN, and most of the bleeding was mild and could be controlled with dressing changes. This might be attributed to the fact that blunt dissection of subcutaneous tissue with a hemostat is more often required for creating the long subcutaneous tunnel for swan-neck catheter implantation.

Our definition of ESI was derived from CARI (Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment) guidelines 2004 (10). The current study was conducted in Macao, which has the same warm and humid weather as Hong Kong. Isolated serous discharge along with local erythema is an important sign of ESI in this environment. The definition was employed to avoid any chance of underdiagnosis of ESI. The incidence of ESI in the study group (with the artificial swan neck) was lower than in the control conventional swan-neck catheter group, although it was not statistically significant (0.51 vs 0.97 episodes/patient-year, p = 0.0657). This might be attributed to the more flexible choice of exit site in the study group, which could be achieved by adjusting the position of the secondary incision according to the body figure of the individual patient. However, the result must be interpreted with caution as the smaller sample size of the current study yielded less power. Nevertheless, the ESI rate of 0.51 episodes per patient-year in the study group was a satisfactory achievement and was comparable with the ESI rate of 0.77 episodes/patient-year for swan-neck catheters reported previously in one Hong Kong study (6). To our surprise, the peritonitis rate was significantly higher in the TC group. However, 5 of the total of 11 peritonitis episodes in the TC group were attributed to one female patient who was later confirmed to have multiple colon diverticula and was switched to HD.

Much as we believe the placement procedure to be as good a method as the insertion of the swan-neck catheter, no such conclusion could be drawn from the current study, even with the prolonged follow-up period. The biggest limitation of our study was the small sample size. The current analysis would be considered likely to detect a 50% relative difference only 20% – 40% of the time. In order to declare equivalence of the two catheters, some 200 patients would be required to enroll for a statistical power of 80%. It was impractical to conduct such a trial in the setting of a single-center study due to the high dropout rate of the long-term PD patient. A multicenter study is suggested.


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PERITONEAL CATHETER STUDY
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
The current study showed that the conventional Tenckhoff catheter configured with an artificial subcutaneous swan neck, inserted with a modified implantation technique, appeared to be an effective and safe catheter placement method. It might be a good alternative to the more expensive swan-neck catheter (in Macao, the price was about US$57 for TC and US$143 for SN); however, studies with a larger sample size are needed for further justification.


    DISCLOSURE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PERITONEAL CATHETER STUDY
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
The authors have no relevant financial relationships and/or conflicts of interest.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Sing-Leung Lui and Wai-Kei Lo (Tung Wah Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China), who gave us extraordinary help and comments during the preparation of this paper. We also thank Loretta Leong and her nursing staff for their important contribution.


    FOOTNOTES
 
a These authors contributed equally to this paper. Back

Received 27 January 2007; accepted 17 July 2008.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PERITONEAL CATHETER STUDY
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Eklund BH, Honkanen EO, Kala AR, Kyllonen LE. Peritoneal dialysis access: prospective randomized comparison of the swan neck and Tenckhoff catheters. Perit Dial Int 1995;15 : 353-6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Strippoli GFM, Tong A, Johnson D, Schena FP, Craig JC. Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15:2735 -46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Gadallah MF, Mignone J, Torres C, Ramdeen G, Pervez A. The role of peritoneal dialysis catheter configuration in preventing catheter tip migration. Adv Perit Dial 2000;16 : 47-50.[Medline]
  4. Lo WK, Lui SL, Li FK, Choy BY, Lam MF, Tse KC, et al. A prospective randomized study on three different peritoneal dialysis catheters. Perit Dial Int 2003;23 (Suppl 2):S127 -31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lye WC, Kour NW, van der Straaten JC, Leong SO, Lee EJC. A prospective randomized comparison of the swan neck, coiled, and straight Tenckhoff catheters in patients on CAPD. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16(Suppl 1):S333 -5.[Abstract]
  6. Piraino B, Bailie GR, Bernardini J, Boeschoten E, Gupta A, Holmes C, et al. Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2005 update. Perit Dial Int 2005;25 : 107-31.[Free Full Text]
  7. Favazza A, Petri R, Montanaro D, Boscutti G, Bresadola F, Mioni G. Insertion of a straight peritoneal catheter in an arcuate subcutaneous tunnel by a tunneler: long-term experience. Perit Dial Int1995; 15:357 -62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA, Saint S. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care; a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002;136 : 792-801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Savader SJ, Lund G, Scheel PJ, Prescott C, Feeley N, Singh H, et al. Guide wire directed manipulation of malfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters: a critical analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8:957 -63.[Medline]
  10. Evidence for peritonitis treatment and prophylaxis guidelines. Peritoneal dialysis catheter-related infection: exit site and tunnel. The CARI (Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment) guidelines, June 2004. Available at: http://www.cari.org.au/DIALYSIS_ptp_published/Part_4_11_PD_catheter_related_infection_exit_site.pdf



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. K.-t. Li and K. M. Chow
Importance of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion by nephrologists: practice makes perfect
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 3274 - 3276.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Kuok, U.-I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Kuok, U.-I


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS