PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 29(2): 217-226
2009
© 2009 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horiuchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horiuchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, Y.

Bench

HPMCs INDUCE GREATER INTERCELLULAR DELOCALIZATION OF TIGHT JUNCTION-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS DUE TO A HIGHER SUSCEPTIBILITY TO H2O2 COMPARED WITH HUVECs

Takashi Horiuchi1, Kazuya Matsunaga1, Masatoshi Banno1, Yusuke Nakano1, Kohei Nishimura1, Chika Hanzawa1, Kei-ichi Miyamoto1, Shinsuke Nomura2 and Yuji Ohta3

Division of Chemistry for Materials,1 Faculty of Engineering, Graduate School of Mie University; Division of Therapeutic Blood Purification,2 Mie University School of Medicine, Ochanomizu University,3 Tsu, Mie, Japan

Correspondence to: T. Horiuchi, Division of Chemistry for Materials, Faculty of Engineering, Graduate School of Mie University, 1577 Kurima-Machiyacho, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507 Japan. horiuchi{at}chem.mie-u.ac.jp


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 

{diamondsuit} Background: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been speculated as possible inducers of structural or functional changes that lead to a hyperpermeable state in patients on long-term peritoneal dialysis. This study aimed to compare localization of tight junction-associated proteins (TJPs), which relate to solute permeability characteristics, between human peritoneal mesothelial cell (HPMC) monolayers and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers under oxidative stress.

{diamondsuit} Methods: HPMCs and HUVECs were cultured on a polymer mesh until transepithelial electrical resistance reached a plateau. Solute permeation tests were conducted using FITC-labeled dextrans. Localization of TJPs was observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope. These experiments were carried out with/without 0.1 mmol/L H2O2. In addition, ROS production as well as the amounts of intracellular reductive glutathione (GSH) and oxidative glutathione were measured.

{diamondsuit} Results: When the monolayers were exposed to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2/medium for 2 hours, the HPMC monolayer revealed a significant reduction in transepithelial electrical resistance (from 32.5 ± 3.4 to 17.4 ± 4.9 {Omega}·cm2) with delocalization of TJPs, particularly occludins. The HUVEC monolayer remained stable and exhibited an unremarkable change in TJP organization. Compared to the HUVEC monolayer, the HPMC monolayer exhibited two- to threefold higher 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein intensities that increased in a dose-dependent manner. HUVECs contained approximately 2.5-times more GSH than HPMCs. This supported the lesser production of ROS when exposed to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2 for 24 hours. HUVECs used 8.03 nmol/mg GSH protein to maintain TJP localization, while only 3.75 nmol/mg GSH protein was available for the HPMCs.

{diamondsuit} Conclusion: The HUVEC monolayer, which was less permeable to middle-to-high molecular weight solutes, was more tolerant against ROS stress than the HPMC monolayer. Availability of intracellular GSH is an important issue in maintaining the integrity of the mesothelium.

KEY WORDS: Human peritoneal mesothelial cells; human umbilical vein endothelial cells; solute permeability; occludin; zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1); transepithelial electrical resistance; oxidative stress; 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein (DCF); glutathione.

Solute and water transport via the peritoneum, which is composed of the mesothelium and the interstitium embedding a network of capillaries, is a major principle of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis therapy. This complex structure, however, hinders our efforts to find the most critical region in the peritoneum when a patient has an unsatisfactory outcome, such as insufficient water and solute removal.

To assess the functional integrity of the peritoneum, the three-pore model developed by Rippe and Stelin has been clinically utilized as the most informative analytical tool (1). In this model, solute permeation data are fitted to theoretical equations on the basis of three hypothetical pores. Although an ultrasmall pore with estimated diameter of 4 – 6 Å has been hypothesized as the water transport channel (i.e., aquaporins), the morphologically corresponding pathways for the other two pores (i.e., small pores and large pores) have not yet been satisfactorily determined.

In the peritoneal equilibration test (PET) commonly used clinically, water soluble substances with low molecular weight, such as creatinine and urea, are monitored and evaluated as dialysate-to-plasma (D/P) ratios (2). Although change in effective peritoneal surface area is one of the crucial factors influencing the D/P ratio, the more intrinsic property, namely solute permeability, should be discussed. Which pathway in the three-pore model would correspond to D/P ratio in a PET? Small pores would be responsible for this pathway because their estimated pore size is around 40 Å. Moreover, the intercellular pathway (lateral) could be specified because these substances do not have a specific transport channel on the plasma membrane.

In the cellular physiology of epithelium and endothelium, an intracellular junction apparatus has been noted as a solute transport barrier, in particular the tight junction (TJ) located at the most apical position (35). The role of the TJ as a solute transport barrier differs in different types of cells. For example, higher solute transport barrier is noted in the vascular endothelial cells of the brain aortic capillary and the cornea (6,7), and in the epithelial cells of the bowel and the cornea (8,9). Our previous study, wherein we constructed a human peritoneal mesothelial cell (HPMC) monolayer on a polymer mesh, suggested the existence of a solute transport barrier that was also controlled by tight junction-associated proteins (TJPs) (10). These TJP organizations relate to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in which transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1) downregulates E-cadherin through expression of transcriptional factor Snail (11). It has been reported that Snail modulates TJPs of Madin–Darby canine kidney cells, resulting in increased ion permeability (12). As described elsewhere, TGF-β1 is not the only factor, other factors such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and advanced glycated end products may be involved in this cellular event (13,14).

Based on this evidence, we hypothesized that TJ characteristics, which relate to solute permeability and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, differ between peritoneal resident cells (e.g., the mesothelium and the endothelium). In order to understand the mechanism of solute transport via the peritoneum and its correlation to TJP organization, it is worthwhile to characterize both the HPMC monolayer and the human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayer in the same experimental setting. The specific purposes of the present study were to compare (1) solute permeability, (2) susceptibility of TJP organization to oxidative stress, (3) ROS productivity, and (4) antioxidative capacity between HPMCs and HUVECs.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
SOURCES OF HPMCs AND HUVECs
The HPMCs were isolated by enzymatic digestion of human omentum. Omental specimens were taken from patients undergoing abdominal surgery after obtaining their consent; this procedure was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mie University Hospital (No. 369). The HPMC cultures were established using a previously described method (15). The HUVECs were purchased from Sanko Junyaku, Tokyo, Japan, and cultured using EGM-2 medium (Cambrex, Walkersville, MD, USA). The chemicals and tissue culture plastics used in the study were described in our earlier study (16). All chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Tokyo, Japan), unless otherwise stated.

CONSTRUCTION OF HPMC AND HUVEC MONOLAYERS ON A MEMBRANE SUPPORT
To construct an in vitro model of the HPMC and HUVEC monolayers, a cell suspension (5 x 104 cells/cm2) was seeded and cultured on a polyester mesh (Transwell, 0.4 µm pore size, 12-well type; Costar, MA, USA) using 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)/medium. The inner and outer chambers were filled with 0.5 mL and 1.5 mL culture medium respectively; the culture medium was replaced every 3 days. In all the experiments described below, HPMCs were used within three passages.

MEASUREMENT OF TRANSEPITHELIAL ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE
Transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) was measured daily or every 2 days using an EVOM volt ohm meter with STX-2 electrodes (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA). The electrodes were inserted into both ends of the mesh. Alternating current of less than ±20 µA was applied between the electrodes at a frequency of 12.5 Hz. Prior to measurement, the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium (0.1% FBS/medium) and maintained at 37°C. The resistance of each monolayer was multiplied by the effective surface area to obtain the electrical resistance of that monolayer (in {Omega}·cm2). To calculate the normalized TER of each monolayer, background TER of a blank polyester mesh was subtracted from the TER of the respective cell monolayer. Any study using the monolayer was conducted 2 days, but not more than 3 days, after steady state was achieved.

SOLUTE PERMEABILITY TEST (SPT)
Once stable TERs were obtained, the permeabilities of the HPMC and HUVEC monolayers were determined by measuring changes in the concentrations of molecular markers. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled dextrans (molecular weights 4, 10, and 70 kDa) were used as fluorescent molecular markers. Each FITC-labeled dextran was added to the inner chamber of the chamber at a final concentration of 50 µg/mL. An equimolar amount of unlabeled dextran was added to the outer chamber of the polyester mesh system to maintain an isotonic condition. At 2 hours and 4 hours after the addition of a molecular marker, a 10-µL volume of each sample was collected from both sides of the chamber. Each sample was assessed using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (F-2000; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at an excitation wavelength of 490 nm and an emission wavelength of 520 nm. The solute permeability coefficient (SPC), which is the flux of FITC-labeled dextran across the monolayer, was calculated using the following equation:

Formula
where K is the SPC (m/s), V is the volume of the basal side (m3), A is the membrane area (m2), {Delta}t is the time interval (s), and C is the concentration of the molecular marker (Ca0 = concentration at the apical side at time 0; Cb4 = concentration at the basal side at 4 hours; Cb2 = concentration at the basal side at 2 hours).

IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STAINING OF OCCLUDINS AND ZONULA OCCLUDENS-1 (ZO-1)
Occludins and ZO-1 were immunohistochemically stained in accordance with a previously described protocol (17). Briefly, HPMCs and HUVECs were cultured on an eight-chambered slide (Nunc, NY, USA) coated with types I and III collagen (Cellmatrix Type 1-A; Nitta Gelatin, Osaka, Japan). Following confluence, HPMCs were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The medium was replaced with fresh medium (0.1% FBS/M199 for HPMCs and 0.1% FBS/EGM-2 for HUVECs) and the cells were incubated for another 24 hours. Subsequently, the cells were washed twice with PBS and then cultured for 30 minutes in the test media. The cells were then fixed in cold acetone/methanol at –20°C for 5 minutes, rehydrated in PBS, and blocked for 1 hour in PBS containing 20% Block Ace (Dainippon Seiyaku, Tokyo, Japan). This was followed by overnight incubation with a primary antibody at 4°C. A rabbit anti-ZO-1 antibody (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA, USA) and a rabbit anti-occludin antibody (Zymed) were used as primary antibodies at a dilution of 1:100 and 1:50 respectively. After incubation with the primary antibody, the cells were washed 5 times with PBS. Subsequently, an appropriate secondary antibody was applied for 1 hour at room temperature, following which the cells were again washed 5 times with PBS. Polyclonal swine anti-rabbit FITC-labeled immunoglobulins (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) were used at a dilution of 1:100 and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Stained specimens were examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Fluoview FV1000; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

EXOGENOUS H2O2 SUPPLEMENTATION INTO THE HPMC AND HUVEC MONOLAYERS
To examine the effect of H2O2 on solute permeation and TJP localization, the HMPC and HUVEC monolayers were supplemented with exogenous H2O2. Prior to the SPT, the effect of H2O2 on enzymatic activities of mitochondria was assessed in a dose-dependent manner using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, which is an indicator of the activity of mitochondrial dehydrogenases. The H2O2 was applied at final concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mmol/L and exposure time was set at 2 hours.

For the SPT, 0.1 and 1.0 mmol/L were selected as H2O2 concentrations based on the results of the MTT assay. After 30-minutes' exposure of the HPMC and HUVEC monolayers to 0.1 mmol/L and 1.0 mmol/L H2O2/medium, SPTs were performed according to the protocol described above.

Immunohistochemical examinations were also carried out to assess the effect of H2O2 on TJP delocalization.

OBSERVATION OF INTRACELLULAR ROS PRODUCTION USING 2',7'-DICHLOROFLUORESCEIN DIACETATE (DCFH-DA)
To quantify intracellular ROS production, DCFH-DA (Sigma, Japan), a fluorescence probe that permeates the cell membrane, was added to the HPMC and HUVEC monolayers at a final concentration of 10 µmol/L after 15 minutes' incubation with 0.01, 0.1, and 1.0 mmol/L H2O2/medium. DCFH-DA was allowed to incorporate into the cells for 15 minutes at 37°C; DCF produced as a result of ROS-induced DCFH oxidation was detected under a confocal laser scanning microscope at an excitation wavelength of 480 nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nm (18).

MEASUREMENTS OF INTRACELLULAR REDUCTIVE GLUTATHIONE (GSH) AND OXIDATIVE GLUTATHIONE (GLUTATHIONE DISULFIDE; GSSG)
The amounts of intracellular GSH and GSSG were measured using an enzymatic recycling method (19). Briefly, after discarding the culture medium, the monolayer cultured on a 35-mm diameter culture flask was washed twice with PBS. The scraped cells were resuspended in 80 µL 10 mmol/L HCl and then frozen at –80°C for 15 minutes. Thawing and freezing of the cell suspension was repeated a couple of times following deproteinization with 5% sulfosalicylic acid. Supernatant (20 µL) was added to a mixture of 30 µL glutathione reductase and 20 µL of 1 mmol/L NADPH. After incubation for 10 minutes at 37°C, 20 µL 10 mmol/L DTNB was added and absorbance was measured at 405 nm at a certain time interval.

To measure the amount of GSSG, 2-vinylpyridine was added prior to the above-mentioned GSH measurement because 2-vinylpyridine inhibits the reduction of GSSG to GSH by binding to GSSG. Therefore, the amount of GSSG could be calculated by subtracting the GSH amount from the total glutathione amount.

DATA ANALYSIS
All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significance of TER, MTT, and solute permeabilities were calculated using Student's t-test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. For the analysis of covariance, we used SAS software for statistical analysis (SAS/STAT User's Guide Release, 6.03 Edition; Tokyo, Japan).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
TRANSEPITHELIAL ELECTRICAL RESISTANCES AND SPCs UNDER PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
As shown in Figure 1, the normalized TER increased steadily, beginning at 0 and leveling off at 23.7 ± 3.2 {Omega}·cm2 on the eighth day (n = 7) for the endothelial monolayer, and at 32.3 ± 2.8 {Omega}·cm2 on the fifth day (n = 4) for the mesothelial monolayer (10). This was accompanied by confluence of cells, as previously mentioned.


Figure 1
View larger version (2K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1 — Comparison of the transepithelial resistances (TERs) between human peritoneal mesothelial cell (HPMC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers. Development of TER in HPMC and HUVEC monolayers cultured on a polyester membrane support (pore size 0.4 µm) was observed. The normalized TER, which was obtained by subtracting the background TER of the blank polyester membrane support from the calculated TER, increased steadily, beginning at 0 and leveling off at 23.7 ± 3.2 {Omega}·cm2 on the eighth day (n = 7) for the endothelial monolayer and at 32.3 ± 2.8 {Omega}·cm2 on the fifth day (n = 4) for the mesothelial monolayer.

 

As distinctly seen in Figure 2, solute permeability of the HUVEC monolayer on the polymer mesh was lower than that of the HPMC monolayer, indicating that the HUVEC monolayer is more resistant to permeation by middle and high molecular weight solutes. A real SPC (Kreal) was calculated by subtracting the blank SPC from the measured SPC in an inverse fashion:

Formula
Kreal,HPMC for 70-, 10-, and 4-kDa dextrans was approximately 8, 3, and 2 times higher than that of Kreal,HUVEC, respectively (Figure 3).


Figure 2
View larger version (2K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2 — Comparison of solute permeability coefficients (SPCs) between human peritoneal mesothelial cell (HPMC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers. The SPCs of the polymer mesh (pore size 0.4 µm) for each molecular marker with and without the HPMC and HUVEC monolayers were measured. As seen in the figure, the solute permeability of the HUVEC monolayer on the polymer mesh was lower than that of the HPMC monolayer, indicating that the HUVEC monolayer is more resistant to the permeation of middle and high molecular weight solutes.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (2K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3 — Comparison of real solute permeability coefficients (SPCs; Kreal). Kreal,HPMC for 70-, 10-, and 4-kDa dextrans were approximately 8, 3, and 2 times higher than the corresponding Kreal,HUVEC. Real SPCs (Kreal) were calculated by subtracting the blank SPC from the measured SPC in an inverse fashion: 1/Kreal = 1/Kmeasured – 1/Kblank. HPMC = human peritoneal mesothelial cell; HUVEC = human umbilical vein endothelial cell.

 
TRANSEPITHELIAL ELECTRICAL RESISTANCES AND SPCs UNDER OXIDATIVE CONDITIONS
Prior to the experiments conducted using H2O2, enzymatic activities of mitochondria were evaluated by the MTT assay wherein both HPMCs and HUVECs were exposed to varying concentrations of H2O2 for 2 hours. There were no significant changes in MTT values during 2 hours of exposure to 0.1 mmol/LH2O2 for HPMCs and HUVECs (Figure 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4 — Effect of supplemented H2O2 concentration on the viability of human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMCs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Enzymatic activities of mitochondria were evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. HPMCs and HUVECs were exposed to various concentrations of H2O2 for 2 hours. A marked reduction in cell viability was seen for >0.5 mmol/L H2O2.

 
The normalized TER of the HPMC monolayer reduced gradually (from 32.5 ± 3.4 to 17.4 ± 4.9 {Omega}·cm2) during the 2-hour exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2/M199 (n = 7). On the other hand, there was no significant reduction in the TER of the HUVEC monolayer during the 2-hour exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2/EGM-2 (n = 9), as shown in Figure 5.


Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5 — Comparison between the human peritoneal mesothelial cell (HPMC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers with respect to changes in transepithelial resistance (TER) due to exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2. Changes in TER of HPMC (A) and HUVEC (B) monolayers due to exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2 were recorded. The normalized TER of the HPMC monolayer reduced gradually, from 32.5 ± 3.4 to 17.4 ± 4.9 {Omega}·cm2 during 2-hours of exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2/M199 (n = 7). On the other hand, there was no significant reduction in TER of the HUVEC monolayer during 2-hours of exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2/EGM-2 (n = 9).

 

Figure 6 shows the SPCs of the polymer mesh (pore size 0.4 µm) for each molecular marker with and without the HPMC and HUVEC monolayers. As distinctly seen in the figure, the solute permeability of the HUVEC monolayer on the polymer mesh was lower than that of the HPMC monolayer, indicating that the HUVEC monolayer is more resistant to the permeation of middle and high molecular weight solutes.


Figure 6
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6 — Comparison between human peritoneal mesothelial cell (HPMC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers with respect to changes in solute permeability coefficients (SPCs) due to exposure to H2O2. The SPCs of the HPMC and HUVEC monolayers due to exposure to H2O2 were measured after 30 minutes of exposure to H2O2. There was no significant change in the SPCs of any of the dextrans through either monolayer except for changes in the 10-kDa dextran through the HPMC monolayer when H2O2 was supplemented at a final concentration of 0.1 mmol/L.

 

INTERCELLULAR LOCALIZATION OF OCCLUDINS AND ZO-1 UNDER OXIDATIVE CONDITIONS
Immunohistochemical staining of occludins and ZO-1 clearly showed the intercellular localization of TJPs. In the control, TJPs, occludins, and ZO-1 were localized along the intercellular spaces, as shown in the left panels of Figure 7. On the other hand, the localized occludins diminished from the intercellular space when the HPMC monolayer was exposed to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2, while they were maintained in the HUVEC monolayer. Disappearance of localized ZO-1 was also observed; however, ZO-1 disappeared to a lesser extent than the occludins.


Figure 7
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7 — Comparison between the human peritoneal mesothelial cell (HPMC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers with respect to the intercellular localization of occludins and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) due to exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2. Immunohistochemical staining of occludins and ZO-1 clearly show the intercellular localization of these tight junction-associated proteins (TJPs). In the control, TJPs, occludins, and ZO-1 were localized along the intercellular spaces, as shown in the left panels. On the other hand, localized occludins diminished from the intercellular space when the cells were supplemented with 0.1 mmol/L H2O2. Disappearance of localized ZO-1 was also observed; however, ZO-1 disappeared to a lesser extent than occludins.

 
INTRACELLULAR PRODUCTION OF ROS UNDER OXIDATIVE CONDITIONS
Figure 8 clearly indicates the dose-dependent production of ROS in both HPMC and HUVEC monolayers due to exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2. A higher production was observed in the HPMC monolayer than in the HUVEC monolayer, even without H2O2 exposure.


Figure 8
Figure 8
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8 — Comparison between human peritoneal mesothelial cell (HPMC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers with respect to intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to exposure to various concentrations of H2O2. Dose-dependent production of ROS was observed in both HPMC and HUVEC monolayers. The HPMC monolayer exhibited higher production than the HUVEC monolayer.

 

AMOUNT OF INTRACELLULAR GSH AND GSSG WITH/WITHOUT 24-HOUR EXPOSURE TO 0.1 MMOL/L H2O2
The amount of total glutathione per milligram proteins was significantly greater in HUVECs than in HPMCs (23.4 ± 11.7 vs 7.19 ± 3.74 nmol/mg protein) (Figure 9). Due to the 24-hour exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2, the amount of GSH decreased significantly, from 12.2 ± 8.67 to 4.17 ± 0.98 nmol/mg protein in the HUVECs and from 4.83 ± 3.10 to 1.08 ± 0.51 nmol/mg protein in the HPMCs. There was no significant change in the amount of total glutathione in either HPMCs or HUVECs.


Figure 9
View larger version (3K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 9 — Comparison between human peritoneal mesothelial cell (HPMC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers with respect to the amount of intracellular reductive glutathione (GSH; white bars) and oxidative glutathione (GSSG; black bars) with/without 24-hour exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2. The amount of total glutathione per milligram proteins was significantly greater in HUVECs than in HPMCs (23.4 ± 11.7 vs 7.19 ± 3.74 nmol/mg protein). Due to this 24-hour exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2, the amount of GSH decreased signif icantly, from 12.2 ± 8.67 to 4.17 ± 0.89 nmol/mg protein, in the HUVECs and from 4.83 ± 3.10 to 1.08 ± 0.51 nmol/mg protein in the HPMCs. There was no significant change in the amount of total glutathione in either HPMCs or HUVECs.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
SOLUTE TRANSPORT THROUGH CULTURED MONOLAYER UNDER PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
To evaluate the integrity of the cellular junctions, we employed the measurement of TER at a low frequency (12.5 Hz), which represents the resistance of passive electrolyte motion through the paracellular pathways. The approximately 1.4-times higher TER of the HPMC monolayer in our experiments is consistent with the reference values summarized in our previous paper (10). Based on these data, we estimated the same tendency for the SPCs of the marker solutes, that is, lower solute permeability for the HPMC monolayer than the HUVEC monolayer.

For the endothelial monolayer, the SPC of D-70 (3.8 x 10–6 cm/s) was almost similar to the values of albumin (4.5 – 5.6 x 10–6 cm/s) and dextran (3 – 8 x 10–6 cm/s) reported previously (10). As can be seen in Figure 3, the real SPC of D-70 for the HPMC monolayer was approximately eight times higher than that for the HUVEC monolayer, whereas only two times higher SPC of D-4 was noted. Therefore, these SPC and TER results indicate that, compared to the HPMC monolayer, the HUVEC monolayer is less permeable to middle-to-high molecular weight solutes but their permeabilities to smaller molecules are similar.

Clinical data usually obtained from PETs reflect overall mass transfer area coefficients, the inverse parameter of which is represented as overall mass transport resistance: Roverall = 1/KoverallAoverall = Rmeso + Rendo = 1/KmesoAmeso + 1/KendoAendo (20). Since each resistance is represented as an inverse of the product of surface area and SPC, the contribution of Rmeso to Roverall may increase when vascular surface area (Aendo) increases. For example, a two-times increase in vascular surface area (Aendo) gives a solute transport resistance of the mesothelium (Rmeso) equal to a 4-kD solute. On the other hand, solute transport resistance (Rmeso) for 10 kDa would be less influenced by the same increment. If SPTs using at least two marker solutes with widely varying molecular weights are available, the differences in solute transport profiles between HPMCs and HUVECs might enable an educated guess as to which layer might be deteriorated.

SOLUTE TRANSPORT AND INTERCELLULAR LOCALIZATION OF TJPs UNDER OXIDATIVE CONDITIONS
It has been suggested that repeated exposure to fresh peritoneal dialysate induces an oxidative stress to peritoneal resident cells, particularly in long-term peritoneal dialysis. In the present study, we employed exogenous supplementation of H2O2 to assess the effect of ROS production and its effects on TJP organization. According to Makino et al.'s recent study, exogenous H2O2 is reduced in a stepwise manner mainly by glutathione when present in low concentrations, and by catalases when present in high concentrations (21). The crossover point is assumed to be around 0.1 mmol/L. In the present study, we employed supplementation of exogenous H2O2 at concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 1.0 mmol/L for the DCFH-DA study, and at a concentration of 0.1 mmol/L for the other experiments (TER, SPT, TJP staining, and GSH). Based on a previous report (22), it can be supposed that the actual intracellular concentrations are probably between one-seventh and one-tenth of the supplemented concentrations.

It has been widely reported that TER and/or solute permeability reflect a well-formed intercellular junction in various types of cells (39). The intercellular space between epithelial and endothelial cells is bridged by a set of specialized structures, namely, TJs or ZO, zonula adherens, desmosomes, and gap junctions. Tight junctions, the most apical structures of the junctional complex, act as a diffusion barrier by controlling the passage of ions, water, and other molecules as well as by maintaining the polarity of cells. Therefore, localization of TJPs is a key factor in comprehending solute transport through a cell layer. Loss of occludin localization was more prominent in HPMCs (Figure 7); this may be evidence enough to speculate that occludin plays a role in the barrier function for electrolyte mobility. A unique extracellular loop of occludin, which contains approximately 60% tyrosine and glycine residues, may partially participate in charge selectivity. Claudins, which are also TJP members, may contribute to the diversity of permeability across different cell types because there are 20 types of claudins expressing differently on each cell type (23). It is speculated that both number and type of TJPs differ between HPMCs and HUVECs, and their expressions along the lateral region might be attributed to the integrity of the extracellular matrices.

INTRACELLULAR PRODUCTION OF ROS
Oxidative stress is usually balanced by the oxidant and antioxidant capabilities of a cell. Scavenging of various types of oxidants occurs largely through H2O2 generation, followed by reduction of H2O2 to H2O by an antioxidative enzyme, various peroxides, and catalases, resulting in an intracellular H2O2 concentration of <1 µmol/L (approximately 1 – 700 nmol/L) under physiological status (22).

DCFH-DA was used in our experiment to detect the intracellular production of ROS because DCFH-DA incorporated into the cells is immediately de-acetylated to DCFH by esterase, a membrane enzyme. This form of DCFH can remain inside the cell. When ROS exist in proximity to this compound, DCFH is oxidized to DCF, which is a fluorescein form. Almost all ROS can oxidize DCFH despite the different reactivities among the ROS, which are as follows (24):

Formula

In our experimental conditions, both ·OH and H2O2 were the major ROS detected by fluorescein intensity and resulted from the imbalance between the intracellular antioxidative activity and the excess amount of exogenous H2O2. While some exogenous H2O2 that passes through the membrane is reduced to H2O by GSH and/or catalase, the remaining H2O2 would contribute to ·OH generation by the gain of electrons from reduced-type transient metal ions such as Fe2+ and Cu+. The latter reaction, known as the Fenton reaction, is the first-order reaction until adequate amounts of reduced-type transient metal ions exist. As seen in Figure 8, there were significant dose-dependent increases in DCF intensity in both HPMC and HUVEC monolayers. In particular, the HPMC monolayer exhibited a stronger intensity than the HUVEC monolayer when exposed to a concentration of up to 1.0 mmol/L H2O2. The difference in the intensity between the HPMC and HUVEC monolayers reveals that the antioxidative capability of HUVECs is much stronger than that of HPMCs. This finding may be important in terms of the primary host defense capacity of HPMCs.

AMOUNT OF INTRACELLULAR GSH AND GSSG
These results help us understand the reasons for the differences in the amounts of antioxidants between the two monolayers. Glutathione (a tri-peptide: L-{gamma}-glutamyl-L-cysteinyl-glycine) is the most abundant intracellular antioxidant responsible for regulating the oxidation–reduction balance.

The GSSG reductase–DTNB recycling method, which was employed in this study, is generally considered a specific, sensitive, rapid, and reliable method (19). Under oxidative stress, GSH is oxidized to GSSG, which is subsequently reduced to GSH by glutathione reductase to maintain a constant intracellular GSH concentration. Under an excess load of oxidative stress, such as 24-hour exposure to 0.1 mmol/L H2O2, which was applied in our experiment, the balance between GSH and GSSG shifted toward the oxidation state, as shown in Figure 9. Our results clearly indicate that the amount of GSH per milligram protein as well as total glutathione amount (GSH + GSSG) are significantly higher in HUVECs than in HPMCs.

Maintaining the integrity of the peritoneal mesothelial layer would contribute to the preservation of natural host defense, which plays an important role in susceptibility to foreign bodies (25). In their in vitro study, Shostak et al. demonstrated D-glucose-induced H2O2 production in rat peritoneal mesothelial cells (26). Lee et al. (18) have reported that a high concentration of glucose (100 mmol/L) causes DCFH-sensitive ROS generation in HPMCs; the intensity of the ROS corresponded to that of the supplemented 0.1 mmol/L H2O2.

Our basic in vitro results reasonably support the results of the In vivo preclinical study with respect to the use of antioxidative agents. Breborowicz et al. and Tager et al. demonstrated the effect of L-2-oxothiazolidine carboxylic acid, a glutathione precursor, on glucose-induced dysfunction of mesothelial cells (27,28). Based on these results, antioxidative treatment of the mesothelium to maintain peritoneal integrity may be important to prevent not only a hyperpermeable state but also epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
The HUVEC monolayer, which is less permeable to middle-to-high molecular weight solutes, is more tolerant against ROS stress than the HPMC monolayer in terms of maintaining solute transport characteristics. Availability of intracellular GSH is important to maintain the integrity of the peritoneum, particularly the mesothelium.


    DISCLOSURE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
I, Takashi Horiuchi, do not have any financial support or relationships with pharmaceutical companies or other entities such as employment contracts, consultancy, advisory boards, speaker bureaus, membership of Board of Directors, stock ownership.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was partly supported by the Foundation for Peritoneal Function Research (grant period: April 2006 to March 2007).

We thank Prof. Kusunoki and Dr. Tonouchi (Mie University School of Medicine, Japan) for providing the omentum samples.

Received 2 October 2007; accepted 26 June 2008.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Rippe B, Stelin G. Simulations of peritoneal solute transport during CAPD. Application of two-pore formalism. Kidney Int 1989; 35:1234 -44.[Medline]
  2. Twardowski ZW, Nolph KD, Khanna R, Prowant BF, Ryan LP, Moore HL, et al. Peritoneal equilibration test. Perit Dial Int 1987; 7:138 -47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Furuse M, Hirase M, Itoh A, Nagafuchi A, Yonemura S, Tsukita S, et al. Occludin: a novel integral membrane protein localizing at tight junctions. J Cell Biol 1993;123 : 1777-88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Tsukita S, Furuse M. Pores in the wall: claudins constitute tight junction strands containing aqueous pores. J Cell Biol2000; 149:13 -16.[Free Full Text]
  5. Feldman GJ, Mullin JM, Ryan MP. Occludin: structure, function and regulation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57 : 883-917.[Medline]
  6. Lee HS, Namkoong K, Kim DH, Kim KJ, Cheong YH, Kim SS, et al. Hydrogen peroxide-induced alterations of tight junction proteins in bovine brain microvascular endothelial cells. Microvasc Res 2004; 68:231 -8.[Medline]
  7. Ma L, Kuang K, Smith RW, Rittenband D, Iserovich P, Diecke FPJ, et al. Modulation of tight junction properties relevant to fluid transport across rabbit corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res 2007; 84:790 -8.[Medline]
  8. Maher S, Feighery L, Brayden DJ, McClean S. Melittin as an epithelial permeability enhancer I: investigation of its mechanism of action in Caco-2 monolayers. Pharm Res 2007;24 : 1336-45.[Medline]
  9. Wang Y, Zhang J, Yi X, Yu FSX. Activation of ERK 1/2 MAP kinase pathway induces tight junction disruption in human corneal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res 2004;78 : 125-36.[Medline]
  10. Kaneda K, Miyamoto K, Nomura S, Horiuchi T. Intercellular localization of occludins and ZO-1 as a solute transport barrier of the mesothelial monolayer. J Artif Organs2006; 9:241 -50.[Medline]
  11. Yanez-Mo M, Lara-Pezzi E, Selgas R, Ramirez-Huesca M, Dominguez-Jimenez C, Jimenez-Heffernan JA, et al. Peritoneal dialysis and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of mesothelial cells. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:403 -13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Carrozzino F, Soulie P, Huber D, Mensi N, Orci L, Cano A, et al. Inducible expression of Snail selectively increases paracellular ion permeability and differentially modulates tight junction proteins. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2005;289 : C1002-14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Rhyu DY, Yang Y, Ha H, Lee GT, Song JS, Uh S, et al. Role of reactive oxygen species in TGF-β1-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in renal tubular epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005;16 : 667-75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Oldfield MD, Bach LA, Forbes JM, Nikolic-Paterson D, McRobert A, Thallas V, et al. Advanced glycation end products cause epithelial–myofibroblast transdifferentiation via the receptor for advanced glycated end products (RAGE). J Clin Invest2001; 108:1853 -63.[Medline]
  15. Stylianou E, Jenner LA, Davies M, Coles GA, Williams JD. Isolation, culture and characterization of human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Kidney Int 1990;37 : 1563-70.[Medline]
  16. Horiuchi T, Miyamoto K, Miyamoto S, Fujita M, Sano N, Minamiyama K, et al. Image analysis of remesothelialization following chemical wounding of the cultured human peritoneal mesothelial cells: the role of hyaluronan synthesis. Kidney Int 2003;64 : 2280-90.[Medline]
  17. Ito T, Yorioka N, Yamamoto M, Kataoka K, Yamakido M. Effect of glucose on intercellular junctions of cultured human peritoneal mesothelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11 : 1969-79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lee HB, Yu MR, Song JS, Ha H. Reactive oxygen species amplify protein kinase C signaling in high glucose-induced fibronectin expression by human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Kidney Int2004; 65:1170 -9.[Medline]
  19. Anderson ME. Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide in biological samples. Methods Enzymol1985; 113:548 -55.[Medline]
  20. Rippe B, Krediet RT. Peritoneal physiology—transport of solutes. In: Gokal R, Nolph KD, eds. The Textbook of Peritoneal Dialysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers;1994 : 69-113.
  21. Makino N, Sasaki K, Hashida K, Sakakura Y. A metabolic model describing the H2O2 elimination by mammalian cells including H2O2 permeation through cytoplasmic and peroxisomal membranes: comparison with experimental data. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004; 1673:149 -59.[Medline]
  22. Stone JR. An assessment of proposed mechanisms for sensing hydrogen peroxide in mammalian systems. Arch Biochem Biophys2004; 422:119 -24.[Medline]
  23. Furuse M, Sasaki H, Tsukita S. Manner of interaction of heterogeneous claudin species within and between tight junction strands. J Cell Biol 1999;147 : 891-903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Setsukinai K, Urano Y, Kakinuma K, Majima HJ, Nagano T. Development of novel fluorescence probes that can reliably detect reactive oxygen species and distinguish specific species. J Biol Chem2003; 278:3170 -5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Liberek T, Topley N, Jorres A, Coles GA, Gahl GM, Williams JD. Peritoneal dialysis fluid inhibition of phagocyte function: effects of osmolality and glucose concentration. J Am Soc Nephrol1993; 3:1508 -15.[Abstract]
  26. Shostak A, Pivnik E, Gotloib L. Cultured rat mesothelial cells generate hydrogen peroxide: a new player in peritoneal defense? J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7:2371 -8.[Abstract]
  27. Breborowicz A, Breborowicz M, Oreopoulos DG. Glucose-induced changes in the phenotype of human peritoneal mesothelial cells: effect of L-2-oxothiazolidine carboxylic acid. Am J Nephrol2003; 23:471 -6.[Medline]
  28. Tager M, Dietzmann J, Thiel U, Neumann KH, Ansorge S. Restoration of the cellular thiol status of peritoneal macrophages from CAPD patients by the flavonoids silibinin and silymarin. Free Radic Res2001; 34:137 -51.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horiuchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horiuchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ohta, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS