PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 27(Supplement_2): 110-115
2007
© 2007 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yung, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yung, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, T. M.

Cells and Matrix

MESOTHELIAL CELLS

Susan Yung and Tak Mao Chan

Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, PR China

Correspondence to: S. Yung, Department of Medicine, Room 302, New Clinical Building, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, PR China. ssyyung{at}hkucc.hku.hk


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 

{diamondsuit} Background: The introduction of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a modality of renal replacement therapy has provoked much interest in the biology of the peritoneal mesothelial cell. Mesothelial cells isolated from omental tissue have immunohistochemical markers that are identical to those of mesothelial stem cells, and omental mesothelial cells can be cultivated in vitro to study changes to their biologic functions in the setting of PD.

{diamondsuit} Method: The present article describes the structure and function of mesothelial cells in the normal peritoneum and details the morphologic changes that occur after the introduction of PD. Furthermore, this article reviews the literature of mesothelial cell culture and the limitations of in vitro studies.

{diamondsuit} Results: The mesothelium is now considered to be a dynamic membrane that plays a pivotal role in the homeostasis of the peritoneal cavity, contributing to the control of fluid and solute transport, inflammation, and wound healing. These functional properties of the mesothelium are compromised in the setting of PD. Cultures of peritoneal mesothelial cells from omental tissue provide a relevant in vitro model that allows researchers to assess specific molecular pathways of disease in a distinct population of cells. Structural and functional attributes of mesothelial cells are discussed in relation to long-term culture, proliferation potential, age of tissue donor, use of human or animal in vitro models, and how the foregoing factors may influence in vitro data.

{diamondsuit} Conclusions: The ability to propagate mesothelial cells in culture has resulted, over the past two decades, in an explosion of mesothelial cell research pertaining to PD and peritoneal disorders. Independent researchers have highlighted the potential use of mesothelial cells as targets for gene therapy or transplantation in the search to provide therapeutic strategies for the preservation of the mesothelium during chemical or bacterial injury.

KEY WORDS: Mesothelial cells; omentum; peritoneum; senescence; proliferation.

Mesothelial cells are specialized epithelial cells that line the internal organs and body wall in the peritoneal, pleural, and pericardial cavities. Irrespective of species (human, rodent, rabbit, or horse) or anatomic origin, mesothelial cells constitute a homogeneous population that adopts a predominantly elongated, flattened, and squamous morphology (1,2). Mesothelial cells of cuboidal morphology have also been identified in close proximity to parenchymal organs such as the spleen, liver, and diaphragm, and to milky spots of the omentum, and also in areas where the mesothelium is injured (24). Ultrastructure studies have highlighted distinct differences between squamous and cuboidal mesothelial cells (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Differences Between Squamous and Cuboidal Mesothelial Cells

 

Abundant microvilli and cilia are found on the luminal surface of the mesothelial cell; they protect the mesothelial surface from frictional injury by entrapment of water and serous exudates (microvilli) and by regulation of surfactant secretion (cilia) (5,6). Mesothelial cells contribute to the normal homeostasis and physiology of serosal cavities. They are the first line of defense during chemical, bacterial, and surgical insult. The present brief review focuses on the structural and functional properties of peritoneal mesothelial cells in vivo and in vitro, and on the potential applications of these properties in peritoneal dialysis (PD) studies.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
FUNCTIONS OF PERITONEAL MESOTHELIAL CELLS
Although previously considered solely to provide a protective, non-adhesive surface that facilitates intracoelomic movement, compelling evidence now highlights the importance of the mesothelium in the maintenance of peritoneal homeostasis, control of fluid and solute transport, immune surveillance, antigen presentation, inflammation, and wound healing (Figure 1). These functions depend on the phenotype of the cells that constitute the mesothelium (7).


Figure 1
View larger version (3K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1 — Functions of peritoneal mesothelial cells. The predominant role of the mesothelium is to preserve peritoneal homeostasis. (1) Under physiologic conditions, mesothelial cells secrete numerous glycosaminoglycans, proteoglycans, and phospholipids that constitute a glycocalyx surrounding the cells and providing a protective barrier against abrasion and a slippery non-adhesive surface for intracoelomic movement. (2) Mesothelial cells participate in both the induction and resolution of peritoneal inflammation through their ability to synthesize a plethora of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors that are secreted into the peritoneal cavity. Mesothelial cells also synthesize matrix proteins that are deposited into the basal lamina on which the cells rest, thus providing structural support and maintaining the architecture of the peritoneal membrane. (3,4,5) Mesothelial cells can facilitate the transport of fluids and solutes across the peritoneal membrane, are the first line of defense during bacterial peritonitis, and can maintain a chemotactic gradient to assist in leukocyte infiltration during bacteria- or chemical-induced inflammation.

 
Mesothelial cells secrete glycosaminoglycans, proteoglycans, and phospholipids to provide a slippery, nonadhesive glycocalyx that protects the serosal surface from abrasion, infection, and tumor dissemination (Figure 1). Mesothelial cells can synthesize a plethora of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and matrix components that regulate inflammation; initiate cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration; and mediate tissue repair (710). Secretion of chemokines promotes transmesothelial migration of neutrophils and monocytes to sites of injury and influx of leukocytes from the vascular compartment into the serosal space (11,12). Mesothelial cells play an active role in local fibrin deposition and clearance in the serosal cavities, and their fibrinolytic activity is essential to the prevention and removal of fibrin deposits that form after mechanical injury and infection (2,7).

The mesothelium is actively involved in the transport and movement of cells and fluid across the serosal cavities through pinocytic vesicles, intracellular junctions, and stomata (2,7). Transport is primarily by convection and diffusion, because the mesothelium offers limited resistance as a biologic barrier. The presence of anionic sites (perlecan, for example) on mesothelial cells endows the peritoneal membrane with a net negative charge that acts as a selective permeability barrier to the passage of plasma proteins (1315).

MORPHOLOGY OF HUMAN PERITONEAL MESOTHELIAL CELLS IN VIVO
The introduction of PD more than three decades ago aroused much interest in the physiology and biology of peritoneal mesothelial cells. Ultrastructure studies of peritoneal samples from PD patients have underscored the detrimental effects of unphysiologic PD solution on the structural integrity of mesothelial cells. Those effects include cell enlargement, transformation from squamous to cuboidal or columnar morphology, increased nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio, vacuolation, activation, and loss of microvilli (16,17). Prolonged exposure of mesothelial cells to PD solutions also results in the collapse of cell–matrix interactions and abrogation of cell–cell contact inhibition, with subsequent shedding of mesothelial cells into the peritoneal cavity. The loss of mesothelial cells from the peritoneal membrane correlates with peritoneal vasculopathy and increased thickness of the submesothelial compact zone (17).

Structural and morphologic changes to the peritoneal mesothelium during PD therefore have serious consequences with regard to the functional integrity of the peritoneum. An intriguing question relates to the fate of these cells after shedding into the peritoneal cavity: Do they represent degenerative cells that are destined for apoptosis and removal from the peritoneal cavity by phagocytosis? Or are they still viable in suspension, capable of maintaining function within the peritoneum?

The fact that mesothelial cells from PD effluent can be cultured suggests that detached cells are viable—at least in part. However, these cells exhibit varied phenotypes and can consist of cells with a cobblestone epithelial morphology; large, senescent cells containing multiple nuclei and multiple vacuoles; or cells with an elongated, fibroblastic appearance. Independent researchers have hypothesized that restoration of the mesothelium after insult involves the detachment of mesothelial cells from adjacent areas free of damage, with subsequent migration to areas of injury where the cells reattach and proliferate to remesothelialize the injured monolayer (18). It is therefore possible that a proportion of the cells shed into PD effluent are destined to assist in peritoneal remesothelialization. Further studies to confirm this hypothesis are warranted.

To delineate the mechanisms by which PD fluid constituents, alone or in combination, modulate the structural and functional integrity of the mesothelium, a reproducible model that can mimic to the greatest extent possible the in vivo environment must be established. Using a model of this sort, researchers can perform experiments in a controlled manner. A cell culture—a three-dimensional cell culture in particular—provides such a model.

MESOTHELIAL CELL CULTURES
The human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMCs) isolated from omental specimens possess biochemical and morphologic characteristics identical to those found in peritoneal mesothelial stem cells. Therefore cultured mesothelial cells provide an excellent tool for studying structural and functional properties under baseline and stimulated conditions.

The culture of HPMCs from omental tissue is well established and reproducible (19,20). Care is required to prevent contamination of mesothelial cell cultures with peritoneal fibroblasts and, to a lesser extent, endothelial cells. Peritoneal fibroblasts can be distinguished by their elongated appearance and negative staining for cytokeratin (20). Endothelial cells can be identified by their ability to form capillary-like tubules in vitro.

The von Willebrand factor was once considered the classical marker for endothelial cells, but studies by Chung–Welch et al. showed that mesothelial cells can also express von Willebrand factor, albeit with less intensity and distinct localization (21). The use of a comprehensive panel of cell markers and phase-contrast microscopy are the best methods for distinguishing HPMCs from endothelial cells (20).

The proliferative potential of HPMCs is limited in culture. Cells can be maintained in culture without significant loss in cell morphology up to the second or third passage. Thereafter, cells become enlarged and flattened, with numerous nuclei and vacuoles. Cells beyond the sixth passage fail to attach to their substratum. Senescence that occurs after a predetermined number of cell divisions is called replicative senescence, a result of critical shortening or uncapping of telomeres (22). Alternatively, senescence can occur in a telomere-independent manner in response to non-optimum culture conditions (23). In this respect, Ksiazek et al. recently reported that the onset of senescence in cultured omentum-derived mesothelial cells is associated with oxidative stress–induced upregulation of the cyclic dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a (24). The age of the omentum donor may also contribute to the rate of mesothelial cell senescence (25).

In the absence of an external stimulus, the aging process of HPMCs is associated with an increase in the inflammatory phenotype. Therefore, to prevent interexperimental discrepancies, the age of the omentum donor should be taken into account when analyzing data. The use of mesothelial cells from rodents has an advantage over use of HPMCs, because neonatal and fetal tissue may provide a population of rapidly dividing cells, often resulting in the establishment of immortal cell lines without terminal differentiation or senescence (26).

The number of mesothelial cells lining the peritoneum depends on the fine balance between cell proliferation and cell death, the latter occurring through apoptosis, necrosis, or senescence. Under normal peritoneal homeostasis, mesothelial cells exhibit limited cell proliferation, with only 0.1%–0.5% of cells in the mesothelium undergoing mitosis at any one time. However, injury to mesothelial cells significantly induces cell proliferation and cell death, thereby altering the structural integrity of the peritoneal membrane. The measurement of HPMC proliferation is a good indicator of a biologic response to any given stimulus. However, merely observing a difference in cell number or a secondary endpoint related to cell proliferation such as [3H]-thymidine incorporation or dye uptake gives limited information.

To analyze the growth characteristics of cultured HPMCs under various stimuli pertaining to PD (for example, elevated glucose concentration, glucose degradation products, advanced glycation end-products, and lactate or bicarbonate buffers), the establishment of growth curves can provide essential information relating to the lag phase (the time taken by HPMCs to recover from subculture and to attach and spread), log phase (exponential increase in cell number), and plateau phase (period when cultures become confluent and the growth rate slows or stops). Data regarding subtle changes to mesothelial cell proliferation, such as the effect of the stimulus on cell attachment, shortening or lengthening of the lag phase, progression through the cell cycle, and cell death can also be obtained from growth curves. The correlation of cell proliferation with changes in cell shape and structure, increased numbers of nuclei or vacuoles, and altered synthesis of mRNA and protein under control and experimental conditions can provide essential information on the impact of any given stimulus on mesothelial cell structure and function (26).

Human peritoneal mesothelial cells have also been isolated from PD effluent (27). It must be emphasized that cells isolated in this way cannot be termed "normal," because they have been exposed to systemic influences pertaining to end-stage renal failure and also to constituents of PD fluids. The significance of these cells with regard to peritoneal change is currently under debate. Yanez–Mo and colleagues have suggested that mesothelial cells shed into PD effluent are representative of the cells lining the mesothelium and therefore reflect the structural and functional status of the peritoneum during PD; however, others have argued that effluent-derived mesothelial cells are instead emblematic of cells committed to peritoneal detachment and cell death (17,27).

Effluent-derived mesothelial cells in culture possess morphologic characteristics identical to those observed in mesothelial cells found in peritoneal biopsies. Such cells therefore provide essential information relating to structural and functional changes in vivo. The limiting factor in the study of effluent-derived mesothelial cells in the poor cell yield (mean: 25,569 ± 2971 cells per overnight bag)—a yield that depends on dwell time, dialysate glucose concentration, posture of the patient during the dwell, and frequency of peritonitis (27,28). The prevalence of non-polygonal HPMCs in PD effluent correlates with the duration for which the patient has been maintained on PD and the frequency of peritonitis (27).

EPITHELIAL-TO-MESENCHYMAL TRANSDIFFERENTIATION
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a central feature of the normal development of tissues and organs by which epithelial cells acquire a mesenchymal, fibroblastic appearance, reduced intercellular adhesions, and increased motility. In vitro, omentum-derived HPMCs adopt a fibroblastic appearance before reaching confluence (20). Mechanical injury of a mesothelial monolayer can also induce EMT in a proportion of cells situated at the periphery of the wound (29). In HPMCs, EMT can be induced by transforming growth factor β1 and is associated with increased expression of the receptor for advanced glycosylation end-products (30,31). Effluent-derived HPMCs cultured ex vivo have also demonstrated EMT in which decreased E-cadherin and cytokeratin expression is associated with an induction of the transcription factor SNAIL. Such changes in mesothelial morphology could be reversed by the addition of BMP-7 (32).

Whether EMT actually occurs in the peritoneum during PD is controversial. Yanez–Mo et al. demonstrated the presence of elongated mesothelial cells positive for cytokeratin and ICAM-1 embedded in the peritoneal submesothelium, but Williams et al. were unable to detect fibroblastic phenotype changes in mesothelial cells. This discrepancy may be attributable to the different methodologies used by the respective authors (17,27).

MESOTHELIAL CELLS AS TARGETS FOR GENE THERAPY AND TRANSPLANTATION IN PD
The omentum is a highly vascularized connective tissue that has been used in reconstructive surgery for many years. Free omentum grafts have also been used successfully in the treatment of various disorders, including Alzheimer disease and leg and gastric ulcers (3335). How the omentum facilitates the healing process in numerous disorders has not been elucidated, although it has been suggested that mesothelial cells within the omentum release growth factors into the injured tissue or are themselves incorporated into the tissue.

To preserve the dialytic efficacy of the peritoneum during PD, cultured HPMCs might perhaps be incorporated into the peritoneum after significant and detrimental structural changes. Independent researchers have suggested that genetic engineering could offer a novel therapeutic strategy (36,37). Briefly, such a procedure would entail the removal of omental specimens from pre-dialysis patients at the time of catheter implantation, followed by isolation, expansion, and genetic modification of the retrieved HPMCs. These cells would then be stored in liquid nitrogen until required. Advantages that ex vivo gene therapy might confer to the peritoneal membrane include increased healing capability or the synthesis of a protein whose expression decreases during PD.

When mesothelial denudation is observed (for example, after peritonitis episodes), genetically modified HPMCs could be infused into the peritoneal cavity through the catheter and allowed to attach to the peritoneal membrane. Theoretically, such an intervention is a most exciting concept, but is this technique feasible in reality? Can a sufficient number of mesothelial cells be generated from uremic patients?

Williams et al. observed the absence of a mesothelium in 18.1% of peritoneal biopsies obtained from predialysis and hemodialysis patients, and in patients that possessed an intact mesothelium, the cells adopted a reactive state (17). Given that HPMCs in culture have a defined lifespan and that they enter senescence after the second passage, can sufficient cells be generated to maintain the cobblestone polygonal morphology without loss of proliferative potential?

In a recent study by Hekking et al., transplantation of mesothelial cells into the peritoneum in a rat model of peritonitis-induced submesothelial thickening prolonged activation and inflammation within the peritoneum (38). If (supposedly) sufficient cells can be generated and stored for future use, then before clinical trials can even be contemplated, it is essential that the mechanism of transplanted cell activation and methods of inhibiting such activation be determined.

The identification, isolation, and exploitation of mesothelial progenitor cells may offer an alternative opportunity to effectively preserve the structural and functional integrity of the peritoneal membrane during PD.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Far from being an inert membrane, the mesothelium is now considered a dynamic structure that plays a pivotal role in peritoneal homeostasis, solute and fluid transport, wound healing, and inflammation. The ability to establish HPMCs in culture has provided immense information about changes in the morphologic, structural, and functional properties of these cells during PD. Investigating the underlying mechanisms that mediate such changes will allow for an exploration of novel strategies (mesothelial cell transplantation, gene therapy, identification and propagation of mesothelial stem cells) that can facilitate preservation of the dialytic efficacy of the peritoneal membrane during PD.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Part of this work was funded by the Wai Hung Charity Foundation.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Nagy JA. Peritoneal membrane morphology and function. Kidney Int 1996;50 (Suppl 56):S2 -11.
  2. Mutsaers SE. Mesothelial cells: their structure, function and role in serosal repair. Respirology 2002;7 : 171-91.[Medline]
  3. Mironov VA, Gusev SA, Barada AF. Mesothelial stomata overlying omental milky spots: scanning electron microscopic study. Cell Tissue Res 1979; 201:327 -30.[Medline]
  4. Tsilibary EC, Wissig SL. Absorption from the peritoneal cavity: SEM study of the mesothelium covering the peritoneal surface of the muscular portion of the diaphragm. Am J Anat 1977;149 : 127-33.[Medline]
  5. Andrews PM, Porter KR. The ultrastructural morphology and possible functional significance of microvilli. Anat Rec1973; 177:409 -26.[Medline]
  6. Bird SD. Mesothelial primary cilia of peritoneal and other serosal surfaces. Cell Biol Int 2004;28 : 151-9.[Medline]
  7. Herrick SE, Mutsaers SE. Mesothelial progenitor cells and their potential in tissue engineering. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2004; 36:621 -42.[Medline]
  8. Yung S, Thomas GJ, Stylianou E, Williams JD, Coles GA, Davies M. Source of peritoneal proteoglycans. Human peritoneal mesothelial cells synthesize and secrete mainly small dermatan sulfate proteoglycans. Am J Pathol 1995;146 : 520-9.[Abstract]
  9. Yung S, Thomas GJ, Davies M. Induction of hyaluronan metabolism after mechanical injury of human peritoneal mesothelial cells in vitro. Kidney Int 2000;58 : 1953-62.[Medline]
  10. Ha H, Cha MK, Choi HN, Lee HB. Effect of peritoneal dialysis solutions on the secretion of growth factors and extracellular matrix proteins by human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Perit Dial Int2002; 22:171 -7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. McLoughlin RM, Witowski J, Robson RL, Wilkinson TS, Hurst SM, Williams AS, et al. Interplay between IFN-{gamma} and IL-6 signaling governs neutrophil trafficking and apoptosis during acute inflammation. J Clin Invest 2003;112 : 598-607.[Medline]
  12. Li FK, Davenport A, Robson RL, Loetscher P, Rothlein R, Williams JD. Leukocyte migration across human peritoneal mesothelial cells is dependent on directed chemokine secretion and ICAM-1 expression. Kidney Int 1998; 54:2170 -83.[Medline]
  13. Gotloib L, Shostack A, Jaichenko J. Ruthenium-redstained anionic charges of rat and mice mesothelial cells and basal lamina: the peritoneum is a negatively charges dialyzing membrane. Nephron1988; 48:65 -70.[Medline]
  14. Galdi P, Stostak A, Jaichenko J, Fudin R, Gotloib L. Protamine sulfate induces enhanced peritoneal permeability to proteins. Nephron 1991; 57:45 -51.[Medline]
  15. Yung S, Chen XR, Tsang RCW, Zhang Q, Chan TM. Reduction of perlecan synthesis and induction of TGF-β1 in human peritoneal mesothelial cells due to high dialysate glucose concentration: implication in peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004;15 : 1178-88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Di Paolo N, Sacchi G, De Mia M, Gaggiotti E, Capotondo L, Rossi P, et al. Morphology of the peritoneal membrane during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephron1986; 44:204 -11.[Medline]
  17. Williams JD, Craig KJ, von Ruhland C, Topley N, Williams GT, for The Biopsy Registry Study Group. The natural course of peritoneal membrane biology during peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int2003; 64(Suppl 88):S43 -9.
  18. Whitaker D, Papadimitrou J. Mesothelial healing: morphological and kinetic investigations. J Pathol 1985;145 : 159-75.[Medline]
  19. Stylianou E, Jenner LA, Davies M, Coles GA, Williams JD. Isolation, culture and characterization of human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Kidney Int 1990;37 : 1563-70.[Medline]
  20. Yung S, Li FK, Chan TM. Peritoneal mesothelial cell culture and biology. Perit Dial Int 2006;26 : 162-73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Chung–Welch N, Patton WF, Shepro D, Cambria RP. Twostage isolation procedure for obtaining homogenous populations of microvascular endothelial and mesothelial cells from human omentum. Microvasc Res 1997; 54:121 -34.[Medline]
  22. Rubin H. The disparity between human cell senescence in vitro and lifelong replication in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 2002; 20:675 -81.[Medline]
  23. Ramirez RD, Morales CP, Herbert BS, Rohde JM, Passons C, Shay JW, et al. Putative telomere-independent mechanisms of replicative aging reflect inadequate growth conditions. Genes Dev2001; 15:398 -403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ksiazek K, Piwocka K, Brzezinska A, Sikora E, Zabel M, Breborowicz A, et al. Early loss of proliferative potential of human peritoneal mesothelial cells in culture: the role of p16INK4a-mediated premature senescence. J Appl Physiol2006; 100:988 -95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Nevado J, Vallejo S, El-Assar M, Peiro C, Sanches–Ferrer CF, Manas LR. Changes in the human peritoneal mesothelial cells during aging. Kidney Int 2006;69 : 313-22.[Medline]
  26. Mather JP. Primary culture. In: Mather JP, Roberts PE, eds.Introduction to Cell and Tissue Culture: Theory and Technique . New York: Plenum Press; 1998:151 -63.
  27. Yanez–Mo M, Lara–Pezzi E, Selgas R, Ramirez–Huesca M, Dominquez–Jimenez C, Jimenez–Heffernan JA, et al. Peritoneal dialysis and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of mesothelial cells. N Engl J Med 2003;348 : 403-13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Betjes MG, Bos HJ, Krediet RT, Arisz L. The mesothelial cells in CAPD effluents and their relation to peritonitis incidence. Perit Dial Int 1991; 11:22 -6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yung S, Davies M. Response of the human peritoneal mesothelial cell to injury: an in vitro model of peritoneal wound healing. Kidney Int 1998;54 : 2160-9.[Medline]
  30. Yang AH, Chen JY, Lin JK. Myofibroblastic conversion of mesothelial cells. Kidney Int 2003;63 : 1530-9.[Medline]
  31. De Vriese AS, Tilton RG, Mortier S, Lameire NH. Myofibroblast transdifferentiation of mesothelial cells is mediated by RAGE and contributes to peritoneal fibrosis in uraemia. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21:2549 -55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Vargha R, Endemann M, Kratochwill K, Riesenhuber A, Wick N, Krachler AM, et al. Ex vivo reversal of in vivo transdifferentiation in mesothelial cells grown from peritoneal dialysate effluent. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21 : 2943-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Piano G, Massad MG, Amory DW Jr, Eton D, Chaer R, Benedetti E, et al. Omental transfer for salvage of the moribund lower extremity. Am Surg 1998; 64:424 -7.[Medline]
  34. Weinzweig N, Schlechter B, Baraniewski H, Schuler J. Lower-limb salvage in a patient with recalcitrant venous ulcerations. J Reconstr Microsurg 1997; 13:431 -7.[Medline]
  35. Chuwa EW, Seow–Choen F. Omentum as a cover for abdominal wall loss. Tech Coloproctol 2006;10 : 139-42.[Medline]
  36. Hoff CM, Schockley TR. Peritoneal dialysis in the 21st century: the potential of gene therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol2002; 13(Suppl 1):S117 -24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Margetts PJ, Gyorffy S, Kolb M, Yu L, Hoff CM, Holmes CJ, et al. Antiangiogenic and antifibrotic gene therapy in a chronic infusion model of peritoneal dialysis in rats. J Am Soc Nephrol2002; 13:721 -8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Hekking LH, Zweers MM, Keuning ED, Driesprong BAJ, de Waart DR, Beelen RHJ, et al. Apparent successful mesothelial cell transplantation hampered by peritoneal activation. Kidney Int 2005; 68:2362 -7.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yung, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yung, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, T. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS