PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 9(2): 107-110 1989
© 1989 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, C.
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, C.
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, P.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 9, Issue 2, 107-110
Copyright © 1989 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Loss of ultrafiltration in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)

CA Pollock, LS Ibels, MD Hallett, B Cocksedge, RJ Caterson, JF Mahony, and PC Farrell

Department of Renal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards N.S.W., Australia.

Fifteen patients on long-term continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) were assessed with respect to net ultrafiltration capacity. Eight patients were defined as having good and seven as having poor ultrafiltration on the basis of net ultrafiltrate obtained/mmol glucose infused. Subsequently, dialysate was sampled at times 0, 1, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 min. No difference in residual volume was observed between the groups. A significantly greater decrease in dialysate sodium during the initial dialysis period in those patients with good as compared to those with poor ultrafiltration occurred, reflecting a greater transcapillary movement of electrolyte poor ultrafiltrate. In those with good ultrafiltration, glucose transfer was normal in five and rapid in three, suggesting the latter had low rates of lymphatic reabsorption. Five of seven patients with poor ultrafiltration had no fall in dialysate sodium in association with a high rate of glucose transfer, suggesting a low rate of transcapillary water movement and normal to high lymphatic absorption. Two patients with low ultrafiltration had an initial fall in dialysate sodium with a normal glucose transfer and thus net ultrafiltration is low due to elevated lymphatic reabsorption. We thus propose that the relative contribution of transcapillary water movement and lymphatic reabsorption can be determined by assessing net ultrafiltration and dialysate sodium concentration in conjunction with solute transfer.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1989 by Multimed Inc.