|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVIEWS AND ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Atlanta, Georgia.
In children undergoing CAPD or CCPD, the authors compared two techniques
for peritoneal catheter insertion by analyzing the probabilities for overall
catheter survival, catheter outflow failure and peritonitis. Between January
1980 and December 1982, catheters were installed with a slightly arcuate
subcutaneous tunnel with a predominantly transverse orientation. After
December 1982 catheters were implanted with a straight subcutaneous tunnel
directed caudally toward the pelvis. We found that a catheter directed toward
the pelvis was associated with improved overall survival. Adoption of this
technique greatly reduced outflow obstruction, the leading cause of catheter
failure before 1983. However, the orientation of the extraperitoneal catheter
segment did not appear to influence the overall risk for peritonitis.
KEY WORDS: Peritoneal catheter; Catheter outflow failure; Peritonitis.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |