PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 6(4): 185-187 1986
© 1986 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hymes, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Warshaw, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hymes, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Warshaw, B. L.

REVIEWS AND ORIGINAL ARTICLES

PERITONEAL CATHETER SURVIVAL IN CHILDREN

Leonard C. Hymes, Bertha Clowers, Carolyn Mitchell and Barry L. Warshaw

From the Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Atlanta, Georgia.

In children undergoing CAPD or CCPD, the authors compared two techniques for peritoneal catheter insertion by analyzing the probabilities for overall catheter survival, catheter outflow failure and peritonitis. Between January 1980 and December 1982, catheters were installed with a slightly arcuate subcutaneous tunnel with a predominantly transverse orientation. After December 1982 catheters were implanted with a straight subcutaneous tunnel directed caudally toward the pelvis. We found that a catheter directed toward the pelvis was associated with improved overall survival. Adoption of this technique greatly reduced outflow obstruction, the leading cause of catheter failure before 1983. However, the orientation of the extraperitoneal catheter segment did not appear to influence the overall risk for peritonitis.

KEY WORDS: Peritoneal catheter; Catheter outflow failure; Peritonitis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1986 by Multimed Inc.