PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 5(4): 233-236 1985
© 1985 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Indraprasit, S.
Right arrow Articles by Panpakde, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Indraprasit, S.
Right arrow Articles by Panpakde, O.

REVIEWS AND ORIGINAL ARTICLES

COMPLETE DIALYSATE DRAINAGE: AN UNNECESSARY STEP IN INTERMITTENT PERITONEAL DIALYSIS

Suchati Indraprasit, Wandee Taramas and Orasa Panpakde

From the Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.

Peritoneal dialysis was performed in 16 renal-failure patients to study the necessity of complete drainage during the outflow period. Comparison between complete drainage (CD) and the accelerated inflow and limited outflow (AILO) showed no difference of drainage volume despite the accelerated outflow during the AILO period. It is postulated that the higher level of dialysate in the fluid line during the AILO period resulted in a relative increase availability of the outflow through the catheter perforations. In the CD period the peritoneal clearances of urea, creatinine and inulin were lower because of inefficient transport of these solutes during the outflow phase. The authors concluded that complete drainage is not necessary in intermittent peritoneal dialysis.

KEY WORDS: Intermittent peritoneal dialysis; Inflow rate; Outflow rate.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1985 by Multimed Inc.