|
|
||||||||
REVIEWS AND ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Division of Nephrology, Toronto Western Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto.
We studied an animal model to test the ultrafiltration capability of three
different peritoneal dialysis solutions: Brand A, containing lactate and
manufactured in Canada, Brand B, containing acetate and manufactured in U.S.A.
and Brand C also containing acetate and manufactured in France. Solutions with
1.5 g0/o and 4.25 g0/o glucose concentrations were tested. We found no
significant difference in the amount of ultrafiltration produced with the
three brands when glucose concentration was 1.5 g0/o. However with glucose
concentration of 4.25 g 0/o ultrafIltration was significantly lower with the
Brand C-French acetate solution comparing to Brand A-Iactate solution. Brand B
(acetate U.S.A.) solution produced ultrafiltration volumes that were between
the other two and were not statistically significantly different from either
Brand A (acetate) nor from Brand C (acetate).
We concluded that the lower ultrafiltration produced by Brand C is not due
to the presence of acetate buffer but to other factors operating alone or in
combination with acetate.
KEY WORDS: Lactate-buffer; acetatebuffer; ultrafiltration; peritoneal dialysis.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |