PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 3(2): 97-98 1983
© 1983 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cannata, J. B
Right arrow Articles by Junor, B. J.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cannata, J. B
Right arrow Articles by Junor, B. J.R.

REVIEWS AND ORIGINAL ARTICLES

COMPARISON OF CONTROL OF SERUM PHOSPHATE LEVELS DURING CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS AND DURING HEMODIALYSIS

Jorge B Cannata*, James D Briggs**, Gordon S Fell*** and Brian J.R. Junor**

* On attachment from the Hospital General de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain. ** Renal Unit, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland. *** University Dept. of Pathological Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland.

Recent reports have suggested that oral aluminium hydroxide carries the risk of aluminium toxicity. We have compared the aluminium hydroxide dose and serum levels of phosphate and aluminium in 27 CAPD and 26 hemodialysis patients. Despite a more liberal protein intake and lower aluminium hydroxide dose, the CAPD patients achieved the same serum phosphate level as those on hemodialysis. While the reason for more efficient serum phosphate control with CAPD is uncertain, the better control gives CAPD an advantage in patients in whom it is particularly important to minimise exposure to aluminium.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1983 by Multimed Inc.