|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Part 3: Clinical Experiences |
Erciyes University School of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Kayseri, Turkey
Correspondence to: B. Tokgoz, Erciyes Universitesi, Tip Fakultesi, Nefroloji Bilim Dali, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey. bulentto{at}gmail.com
Chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) continues to be an option in the
treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Medical, social, and logistic
considerations are needed to determine the most suitable dialysis option for
an ESRD patient. Peritoneal dialysis has been advancing in terms of technique,
new exchange systems, and a new generation of solutions. A survival advantage
for PD patients has been noted over the first 1 – 2 years after the
onset of the dialysis. Most patients may need both dialytic modalities in
time, and therefore the sequence of the treatment options is important.
Compared with hemodialysis patients, PD patients seem much more satisfied in
most of the studies that evaluate quality of life during treatment. A
preference for PD may be more advantageous in the pre-transplantation period.
Moreover, much lower doses of erythropoietin have been shown to be sufficient
for PD patients. Also, PD has been reported to protect residual renal
functions better in many studies.
KEY WORDS: Survival; residual renal function.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |