|
|
||||||||
Clinical Sciences |
Nephrology Division,1 Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital; Nephrology Division,2 Department of Medicine, Tung Wah Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Correspondence to: K.N. Lai, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, No. 102, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong. knlai{at}hkucc.hku.hk
Background: Ultrafiltration failure is an important
clinical problem in patients on maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD) and is
associated with high morbidity and mortality. Acute ultrafiltration failure
(AUFF) is usually secondary to mechanical problems with the peritoneal
catheter or peritoneal leakage. Retroperitoneal leakage (RPL) is an important
cause of AUFF and often poses diagnostic difficulty. Herein we analyze the
incidence of AUFF secondary to RPL in our centers and study its associated
risk factors.
Methods: After excluding causes due to mechanical
problems with the peritoneal catheter, patients complicated by AUFF underwent
computerized tomographic peritoneography (CTP) or magnetic resonance imaging
of the peritoneal cavity (MRP) to determine any RPL. Other patients on
maintenance PD without RPL served as controls for comparison of risk factors.
Demographic and peritoneal membrane characteristics, including history of
hernia and pleuroperitoneal leakage, were analyzed.
Results: During the 5-year study period, 36 patients in
a cohort of 743 patients on maintenance PD developed AUFF. 23 of these 36
patients were found to have RPL, which was confirmed by either CTP (n
= 16) or MRP (n = 7). The duration of PD at the time of RPL and the
dialysate-to-plasma ratio of creatinine at 4 hours were 49.3 ± 24.5
(range 0.5 – 87.9) months and 0.70 ± 0.09 respectively.
Incidences of hernia (52.2%) and pleuroperitoneal communication (34.8%) were
significantly higher than in PD patients without RPL (13% and 7% respectively,
p = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified hernia and
pleuroperitoneal communication as the risk factors for RPL. The odds ratios
for RPL with hernia and pleuroperitoneal communication were 6.62 [95%
confidence interval (CI) 2.35 – 18.69, p < 0.001] and 6.23
(95% CI 1.83 – 21.19, p = 0.003) respectively.
Conclusion: RPL was not uncommon in patients with AUFF.
A high index of suspicion for RPL is needed in the management of patients with
history of hernia or pleuroperitoneal communication presenting with
AUFF.
KEY WORDS: Ultrafiltration failure; retroperitoneal leakage; computerized tomographic peritoneography; magnetic resonance peritoneography.
Received 3 September 2008; accepted 29 October 2008.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |