|
|
||||||||
Clinical |
Australasian Kidney Trials Network,1 University of Queensland; Department of Nephrology,2 Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane; The George Institute for International Health,3 Sydney, Australia; Department of Renal Medicine,4 Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; Child & Adolescent Renal Service,5 Royal Children's and Mater Children's Hospitals; Infection Management Services,6 Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane; Department of Nephrology,7 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Correspondence to: D. Johnson, Department of Nephrology, Level 2, ARTS Building, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane Qld 4102, Australia. david_johnson{at}health.qld.gov.au
Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to
determine whether daily exit-site application of standardized antibacterial
honey (Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel; Comvita, Te Puke, New Zealand)
results in a reduced risk of catheter-associated infections in peritoneal
dialysis (PD) patients compared with standard topical mupirocin prophylaxis of
nasal staphylococcal carriers.
Design: Multicenter, prospective, open label,
randomized controlled trial.
Setting: PD units throughout Australia and New
Zealand.
Participants: The study will include both incident and
prevalent PD patients (adults and children) for whom informed consent can be
provided. Patients will be excluded if they have had
(1) a history of psychological
illness or condition that interferes with their ability to understand or
comply with the requirements of the study;
(2) recent (within 1 month)
exit-site infection, peritonitis, or tunnel infection;
(3) known hypersensitivity to,
or intolerance of, honey or mupirocin;
(4) current or recent (within 4
weeks) treatment with an antibiotic administered by any route; or
(5) nasal carriage of
mupirocin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Methods: 370 subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive
either daily topical exit-site application of Medihoney Antibacterial Wound
Gel (all patients) or nasal application of mupirocin if staphylococcal nasal
carriage is demonstrated. All patients in the control and intervention groups
will perform their usual exit-site care according to local practice. The study
will continue until 12 months after the last patient is recruited (anticipated
recruitment time is 24 months).
Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure will
be time to first episode of exit-site infection, tunnel infection, or
peritonitis, whichever comes first. Secondary outcome measures will include
time to first exit-site infection, time to first tunnel infection, time to
first peritonitis, time to infection-associated catheter removal,
catheter-associated infection rates, causative organisms, incidence of
mupirocin-resistant microbial isolates, and other adverse reactions.
Conclusions: This multicenter Australian and New
Zealand study has been designed to provide evidence to help nephrologists and
their PD patients determine the optimal strategy for preventing PD
catheter-associated infections. Demonstration of a significant improvement in
PD catheter-associated infections with topical Medihoney will provide
clinicians with an important new prophylactic strategy with a low propensity
for promoting antimicrobial resistance.
KEY WORDS: Exit-site infection; honey; Medihoney; mupirocin; peritonitis; randomized controlled trial; tunnel infection; bacterial infection; fungal infection.
Received 21 May 2008; accepted 30 September 2008.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. V. Badve, A. Smith, C. M. Hawley, and D. W. Johnson Adherence to guideline recommendations for infection prophylaxis in peritoneal dialysis patients NDT Plus, December 1, 2009; 2(6): 508 - 508. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|
S. V. Jassal and C. E. Lok THE HONEYPOT: STICKY OR SWEET? Perit. Dial. Int., May 1, 2009; 29(3): 267 - 269. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |