|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Part 5: Peritoneal Solution |
1 Department of Internal Medicine and Kidney Research Institute, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon;2 Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul;3 Department of Internal Medicine, Eulji University College of Medicine, Seoul; 4 Nephrology Clinic, Center for Clinical Services, National Cancer Center, Ilsan;5 Department of Internal Medicine, Gacheon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to: Kook-Hwan Oh, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul
National University Hospital, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744 South
Korea; or Sung Gyun Kim, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University
Sacred Heart Hospital, 896 Pyeongchon-dong, Dongan-gu, Anyang 431-070 South
Korea.
ohchris{at}hanmail.net
or
sgkim{at}hallym.ac.kr
Objectives: In vitro studies of peritoneal dialysis (PD)
solutions demonstrated that a lactate-buffered fluid with neutral pH and low
glucose degradation products (LF) has better biocompatibility than a
conventional acidic lactate-buffered fluid (CF). However, few clinical trials
have evaluated the long-term benefit of the biocompatible solution on residual
renal function (RRF). To compare LF with CF, we performed a prospective,
randomized study with patients starting PD.
Patients and Methods: After 1-month run-in period, 91 new
PD patients were randomized for 12 months of treatment with either LF
(Balance: Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany; n = 48) or CF
(Stay*Safe: Fresenius; n = 43). We measured RRF, acid-base
balance, peritoneal equilibration test, and adequacy of dialysis every 6
months after the run-in period.
Results: After 12 months of treatment, the residual
glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients using LF tended to be higher than
that of patients on CF (p = 0.057 by repeated-measures analysis of
variance). We observed a significant difference in the changes of residual GFR
between the two groups (p = 0.009), a difference that was especially
marked in the subgroup whose baseline residual GFR was more than 2 mL/min/1.73
m2. In addition, serum total CO2 levels were higher
(p = 0.001) and serum anion gap was lower (p = 0.019) in the
LF group. We observed no differences between groups for Kt/V, C-reactive
protein, or normalized protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance.
Conclusions: In incident PD patients with significant
residual GFR, LF may better preserve RRF over a 12-month treatment period.
Additionally, pH-neutral PD fluid may improve acid-base balance as compared
with CF.
KEY WORDS: Biocompatibility; glucose degradation products; residual renal function.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |