PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 27(Supplement_3): 18- 2007
© 2007 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, R.R.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, M.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, R.R.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, M.J.

Clinical Experience

Home Care Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis: the Impact of Expanding Eligibility for Peritoneal Dialysis on the Risk of Hospitalization

R.R. Quinn, K.D. Hunt, L. Lodberg, T. Pham and M.J. Oliver

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Objective: Offering home care assistance increases the number of patients (pts) who are eligible for peritoneal dialysis (PD) and may increase PD utilization. There is concern that managing older, sicker pts in the home may increase the risk of adverse events. The primary objective of this study is to determine if home care assisted PD is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization compared to hemodialysis (HD). Methods: We followed all incident dialysis pts at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Canada, from 1 January 2004 until 31 July 2006. We identified 105 pts who were eligible for both PD (with or without assistance) and HD based on a rigorous multidisciplinary assessment and followed them for a median of 621 days. Pts were offered both therapies and allowed to choose their chronic dialysis modality. Baseline demographic, comorbidity, and treatment information was collected on all pts and the total number of hospital admissions and days spent in hospital were recorded. Poisson regression was used to calculate the relative rate of hospitalization in pts on home care assisted PD compared to HD after adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, predialysis care, and in-pt dialysis start. Results: 57% of incident pts chose PD. Pts who chose PD were more likely to have received predialysis care (92% vs 57%, p=0.0004) and 33% required assistance at the start of dialysis. The PD group was hospitalized 1.4 times per year for a total of 23.6 days compared to 1.2 admissions and 24.2 days per year in the HD group. After adjustment for baseline pt characteristics, there was no significant difference in rates of hospitalization between the 2 groups (rate ratio 0.91; p=0.4165). There was no difference in the rates of hospitalization between self-care PD, assisted PD, and traditional HD (p=0.4892). Conclusions: There does not appear to be an increased risk of hospitalization in pts who choose home care assisted PD compared to traditional, in-center HD. Larger studies are required to confirm this finding and to ensure that rates of other important adverse events are not increased when we expand eligibility for PD by offering home care assistance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2007 by Multimed Inc.