PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 27(Supplement_3): 15- 2007
© 2007 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franco, M.G.
Right arrow Articles by Lima, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Franco, M.G.
Right arrow Articles by Lima, G.

Clinical Experience

Peritoneal Dialysis in the Elderly Patient

M.G. Franco and G. Lima

Nephrology Department, Gamen, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Objective: Retrospective analysis of a group of elderly patients (pts) on peritoneal dialysis (PD), CAPD, and automated PD (APD) in Rio de Janeiro. Methods: We selected 108 non-institutionalized elderly pts on PD at Clinica Gamen, from April 1997 to November 2006. They had been on the program for at least 3 months. We studied pts alive (35.1%), dead (50.9%), and switched to hemodialysis (HD) (13.8%). All of them, aged 66 years or more, were or still are on CAPD, APD, or AAPD. We analyzed age, sex, cause of renal failure, dialysis modality, technique survival, peritonitis rate, comorbidities, and cause of death. Crude survival is shown as Kaplan–Meier curves. Results: Overall there were 108 pts (48 men, 60 women); their mean age was 77.25±6.99 years (range 66–97) with predominance of females (55.5%). The most common cause of renal failure was hypertension (50.9%) and diabetes mellitus (43.5%). Among the comorbid conditions, considering only the pts alive, the most frequent were hypertension in 94.7%, depression in 50%, CVD in 42.1%, PVD in 39.4%, impaired vision in 21%, malignancy in 10.5%, COPD in 10.5%, and dementia in 5.2%. Considering all the 108 pts, CAPD was applied in 60 pts (55.5%), APD in 24 pts (22.2%), AAPD in 8 pts (7.4%) and in same cases, 5 pts (4.6%) were switched from CAPD to APD and 6 pts (5.5%) were on IPD. The mean age between the pts still in our PD program, is 76.76±7.07 years and the technique survival is 25.93 months. Considering these pts, the peritonitis rate in the last 5 years is 1/26.8 pt-months. Of these episodes, 41.66% were due to staphylococci. The main causes of death were CVD in 33 pts (60%), followed by infection in 17 pts (30.9%), 4 (7.2%) of these, from peritonitis, cerebrovascular accident in 1 pt (1.8%), indeterminate cause in 2 pts (3.6%), and malignancy in 1 pt (1.8%). The overall survival of these pts was 81.7% at 12 months, 70.80% at 24 months, and 51.3% at 30 months. Technique survival was 94% at 24 months, 82% at 30 months, and 82.2% at 36 months. Conclusions: PD is a good option with a reasonable technique survival rate. The results in terms of survival must be interpreted according to the age and initial conditions of the pt.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2007 by Multimed Inc.