PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Perit Dial Int 27(Supplement_2): 250-254
2007
© 2007 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. W.

Part 7: Nutrition in PD

WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL FAT MASS IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS?

David W. Johnson

Department of Renal Medicine, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Correspondence to: D.W. Johnson, Department of Renal Medicine, Level 2, Ambulatory Renal and Transplant Services Building, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane Queensland 4102 Australia. david_johnson{at}health.qld.gov.au

The prevalence of obesity in peritoneal dialysis (PD) populations has risen dramatically since the mid-1980s. This epidemic has been driven by the increased prevalence of obesity in the general population, the increased risk of progression of chronic kidney disease to end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in obese subjects, the reduced probability of listing obese dialysis patients for renal transplantation, a paradoxical enhanced survival in at least some obese populations on dialysis as compared with non-obese ESRF patients, and a possible adipogenic effect of excessive peritoneal glucose absorption in PD. Although obesity has consistently been associated with improved outcomes in hemodialysis, conflicting results have been seen in PD. In general, an elevated body mass index (BMI) has been associated with a neutral or deleterious impact on PD outcomes, and the relationship appears to be explained predominantly by fat mass. Risk is also elevated in patients with a low BMI, such that the "optimal BMI" appears to lie between 20 kg/m2 and 25 kg/m2. The mechanisms underpinning the harmful effect of obesity appear to include increased peritonitis rate, proinflammatory effects, and a more rapid decline of residual renal function in obese patients. No proof exists that weight reduction engenders an improvement in outcome in PD patients, but the available studies suggest that cautious weight reduction is advisable. A few studies have demonstrated that clinically important and sustained weight reduction can be successfully achieved through a combination of individual meal plans, regular exercise, and substitution of icodextrin for dextrose in the once-daily long dwell.

KEY WORDS: Body mass index; chronic kidney failure therapy; nutrition status; peritonitis; risk factors; survival rate.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2007 by Multimed Inc.