|
|
||||||||
Part 5: PD in Pediatric, Elderly, and Diabetic Patients |
Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation Children's Unit, University Hospital, University Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France
Correspondence to: M. Fischbach, Pédiatrie 1, University Hospital, Avenue Molière, Strasbourg Cedex 67098 France. Michel.Fischbach{at}chru-strasbourg.fr
The peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription should be adequate before
being optimal. The peritoneal membrane is a dynamic dialyzer: the surface area
and the vascular area both have recruitment capacity.
At bedside, prescription is based mainly on tolerance of the prescribed
fill volume, and therefore a too-small fill volume is often prescribed. A
too-small fill volume may lead to a hyperpermeable exchange, with potentially
enhanced morbidity—or even mortality—risks. Better understanding
of the peritoneal membrane as a dynamic dialysis surface area allows for an
individually adapted prescription, which is especially suitable for children
on automated PD.
Fill volume should be scaled for body surface area (mL/m2)
and, to avoid a hyperpermeable exchange, for a not-too-small amount. Fill
volume enhancement should be conducted under clinical control and is best
determined by intraperitoneal pressure measurement in centimeters of
H2O. In children 2 years of age and older, a peak fill volume of
1400 – 1500 mL/m2 can be prescribed in terms of tolerance,
efficiency, and peritoneal membrane recruitment.
Dwell times should be determined individually with respect to two
opposing parameters:
The new PD fluids (that is, those free of glucose degradation products,
with a neutral pH, and not exclusively lactate-buffered) appear to be the best
choice both in terms of membrane recruitment and of preservation of peritoneal
vascular hyperperfusion.
KEY WORDS: Children; fill volume; dwell time; peritoneal membrane; hyperpermeable exchange.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |