PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Perit Dial Int 27(Supplement_2): 153-157
2007
© 2007 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, P. K.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Li, P. K.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, K. M.

Part 4: Technical Advances in PD

CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS IS BETTER THAN AUTOMATED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT IN RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY

Philip Kam-Tao Li, Kwok Yi Chung and Kai Ming Chow

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, PR China

Correspondence: P.K.T. Li, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, PR China. philipli{at}cuhk.edu.hk

This article examines the roles of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) versus automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) as first-line renal replacement therapy. To date, no high-quality large-scale randomized controlled studies have compared CAPD with APD as first-line therapy. However, a discussion on this issue is important so that nephrologists can decide and patients can have a choice of modality on which to start dialysis, especially in the context of health care economics. We review the literature and present Hong Kong as the model of a "CAPD first" policy, an appealing, cost-effective approach for any country.

An ideal renal replacement therapy should provide optimal survival, lowest possible risk for comorbidity, highest level of quality of life, and equally important, acceptable cost to society. When we consider this subject in the context that all patients should be started on one first-line modality, the data suggest that a "CAPD first" policy has all these advantages, with APD probably having the edge only with regard to patient preference. The present review highlights preservation of residual renal function, removal and balancing of sodium, incidence of peritonitis, peritoneal membrane transport status, patient rehabilitation, and financial issues in demonstrating that a "CAPD first" policy is the model that should be adopted.

KEY WORDS: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; automated peritoneal dialysis; first-line therapy; cost; residual renal function.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2007 by Multimed Inc.