|
|
||||||||
Clinical |
1 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Medical University & Hospital; 2 School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University; 3 Department of Public Finance, National Chengchi University;4 Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Correspondence to: T.-J. Chen, Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans
General Hospital, 201 Shih-Pai Road Sec. 2, Taipei 11217,
Taiwan.
tjchen{at}vghtpe.gov.tw
Objectives: To analyze the trend of global peritoneal
dialysis (PD) publications, especially of publications in Peritoneal
Dialysis International (PDI), from 1991 to 2005 according to the
Institute for Scientific Information databases of the Thomson Corporation.
Methods: Data were downloaded from the Web of Science,
which includes the databases of Science Citation Index Expanded and Social
Sciences Citation Index. The searching strategies were key-in of
"peritoneal dialysis" in general search and of
"SO=Peritoneal Dialysis International" in advanced search. Only
articles and reviews were included in the analysis. The analysis was
stratified by publication year, journal, author, country of each author's
affiliation, and citation count of each paper.
Results: There were 7618 PD papers (6991 articles and 627
reviews) in 887 journals; 15.8% of them (n = 1204) were published in
PDI. The annual outputs of global PD publications has been more than
500 papers since 1996, with a peak of 665 articles in 2003. In total, 18531
authors from 102 countries and areas contributed to PD publications. Authors
from the USA were present in 30.6% of all papers although their global share
decreased with time. A PD paper received an average of 12.7 citations. A
review received more citations than an article (17.0 vs 12.3 on average), yet
statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.216, Mann-Whitney U
test).
Conclusions: The number of PD research societies in the
world has been growing during the past 15 years. More and more research is
from countries other than the USA and the United Kingdom. Papers on PD have
thus been published in many journals other than PDI, the leading
journal in PD. However, the growth rate of PD publications in the world is
diminishing. We present here the most likely reasons for the decrease in PD
publications and propose suggestions for PDI to keep its leading role
in the development of PD.
KEY WORDS: KEY WORDS:; Bibliometrics; publishing.
Received 12 June 2006; accepted 20 October 2006.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |