|
|
||||||||
Clinical |
Nephrology Department, CHU Clemenceau, Caen, France
Correspondence to: T. Lobbedez, Nephrology Department, CHU Clemenceau, Avenue
G Clemenceau, 14 033 Caen Cedex,
France.
lobbedez-t{at}chu-caen.fr
Background: The French healthcare system offers the
possibility of increasing the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) by involving in
patient care nurses who work in the private system.
Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the impact
of a private home-nurse network on one dialysis program.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of 239 dialysis
patients who started dialysis in our center between 1 January 1998 and 31
December 2003.
Results: Of these 239 patients, 142 were treated with
hemodialysis and 97 with PD during the study period. Among the PD patients, 36
of 97 were treated with assisted PD and 61 of 97 with self-care PD.
Assisted-PD patients were older (74 ± 10 vs 52 ± 18 years,
p < 0.001) and presented more comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity
Index 7 ± 2.5 vs 4.3 ± 2.4, p < 0.05) compared with
self-care patients. Continuous ambulatory PD was the modality of choice in the
assisted group (32/36). Assisted patients were frequently hospitalized
(31/36); actuarial survival free of hospitalization at 6 months was 46%.
Patients with nurse assistance had a high risk of peritonitis (actuarial
survival free of peritonitis: 52% at 1 year). Technique survival was 85% at 6
months and 58% at 1 year. Actuarial patient survival was 90% at 6 months and
83% at 1 year.
Conclusion: Assisted PD enables increased use of PD in
incident dialysis patients. However, in view of the comorbidities of the
assisted-PD patients, the need for frequent hospitalization has to be taken
into account in such a program.
KEY WORDS: Elderly; assisted.
Received 1 December 2005; accepted 16 March 2006.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Bouvier, P.-Y. Durand, A. Testa, C. Albert, V. Planquois, J.-P. Ryckelynck, and T. Lobbedez Regional discrepancies in peritoneal dialysis utilization in France: the role of the nephrologist's opinion about peritoneal dialysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 25, 2008; (2008) gfn648v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Mendelssohn, S. K. Mujais, S. D. Soroka, J. Brouillette, T. Takano, P. E. Barre, B. V. Mittal, A. Singh, C. Firanek, K. Story, et al. A prospective evaluation of renal replacement therapy modality eligibility Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 28, 2008; (2008) gfn484v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Brown, M. Dratwa, and J. V. Povlsen Assisted peritoneal dialysis an evolving dialysis modality Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 3091 - 3092. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |