PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 26(2): 136-143 2006
© 2006 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamoto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamoto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, H.

PERITONEAL DIALYSIS IN JAPAN

IS TECHNIQUE SURVIVAL ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS BETTER IN JAPAN?

Hidetomo Nakamoto1, Yoshindo Kawaguchi2 and Hiromichi Suzuki1

Department of Nephrology,1 Saitama Medical School, Saitama; Department of Nephrology,2 Kanagawa Prefectural Hospital, Japan

Correspondence to: H. Nakamoto, Department of Nephrology, Saitama Medical School, 38 Morohongo, Moroyamamachi, Iruma-gun, Saitama 350-0495, Japan.
nakamoams{at}yahoo.co.jp; nakamo_h{at}saitama-med.ac.jp

Technique failure resulting in transfer to hemodialysis (HD) remains one of the most important challenges in long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD). In general, the proportion of patients transferring from PD to HD is much greater than the proportion transferring from HD to PD. However, technique failure rates differ considerably between and within countries.

The question arises as to how technique failure rates in Japan compare with those in other countries. To address this issue, we reviewed the literature and our experience of 139 incident continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients from January 1995 to December 1999.

Based on our review, we estimate that the 5-year technique survival rate in Japanese CAPD patients is approximately 70%, and that technique failure rate is around 7% per year. This rate is significantly lower than that in many other countries. The most common reasons for technique failure in Japan are peritoneal membrane failure, ultrafiltration loss, and inadequate dialysis. Another factor contributing to the low technique failure rate in Japan is an extremely low peritonitis rate. This may be related to good sanitation and excellent PD training programs. Peritoneal membrane failure continues to be the major challenge for long-term technique survival on PD in Japan.

KEY WORDS: Technique survival; peritonitis; ultrafiltration loss; Japan.

Received 5 July 2005; accepted 31 January 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. Fang, J. Qian, A. Lin, F. Rowaie, Z. Ni, Q. Yao, J. M. Bargman, and D. G. Oreopoulos
Comparison of peritoneal dialysis practice patterns and outcomes between a Canadian and a Chinese centre
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 4021 - 4028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2006 by Multimed Inc.