|
|
||||||||
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS IN JAPAN |
Department of Nephrology,1 Saitama Medical School, Saitama; Department of Nephrology,2 Kanagawa Prefectural Hospital, Japan
Correspondence to: H. Nakamoto, Department of Nephrology, Saitama Medical
School, 38 Morohongo, Moroyamamachi, Iruma-gun, Saitama 350-0495,
Japan.
nakamoams{at}yahoo.co.jp;
nakamo_h{at}saitama-med.ac.jp
Technique failure resulting in transfer to hemodialysis (HD) remains one of
the most important challenges in long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD). In
general, the proportion of patients transferring from PD to HD is much greater
than the proportion transferring from HD to PD. However, technique failure
rates differ considerably between and within countries.
The question arises as to how technique failure rates in Japan compare with
those in other countries. To address this issue, we reviewed the literature
and our experience of 139 incident continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
(CAPD) patients from January 1995 to December 1999.
Based on our review, we estimate that the 5-year technique survival rate in
Japanese CAPD patients is approximately 70%, and that technique failure rate
is around 7% per year. This rate is significantly lower than that in many
other countries. The most common reasons for technique failure in Japan are
peritoneal membrane failure, ultrafiltration loss, and inadequate dialysis.
Another factor contributing to the low technique failure rate in Japan is an
extremely low peritonitis rate. This may be related to good sanitation and
excellent PD training programs. Peritoneal membrane failure continues to be
the major challenge for long-term technique survival on PD in Japan.
KEY WORDS: Technique survival; peritonitis; ultrafiltration loss; Japan.
Received 5 July 2005; accepted 31 January 2006.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Fang, J. Qian, A. Lin, F. Rowaie, Z. Ni, Q. Yao, J. M. Bargman, and D. G. Oreopoulos Comparison of peritoneal dialysis practice patterns and outcomes between a Canadian and a Chinese centre Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 4021 - 4028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |