PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 23(5): 450-455 2003
© 2003 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valdes-Sotomayor, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valdes-Sotomayor, J
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 23, Issue 5, 450-455
Copyright © 2003 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Increased severity of Escherichia coli peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients independent of changes in in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing

J Valdes-Sotomayor, A Cirugeda, MA Bajo, G del Peso, E Escudero, JA Sanchez-Tomero, R Selgas, and

Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Instituto Reina Sofia de Investigacion Nefrologica, Madrid, Spain.

OBJECTIVE: Despite improvements in peritoneal dialysis (PD) technique, peritonitis continues to be one of the most frequent complications of PD. Nonresolving peritonitis remains a risk for severe anatomical peritoneal changes that may limit the viability of the membrane for dialysis purposes. We have observed remarkably poor outcome of peritonitis caused by Escherichia coli in the past 6 years. With its very low response rate to broad-spectrum antibiotics, the increased severity of E. coli peritonitis deteriorates peritoneal function and affects patient outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Two large PD units in two university hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The total number of patients reviewed was 456. The records of 49 E. coli peritonitis episodes were studied.The observation period started in 1980 and ended in March 2001. Sixteen males and 19 females were included. Severity was defined in terms of days of peritoneal inflammation, lack of response to a potentially useful antibiotic, requirement for catheter removal, and/or laparotomy. Study cases (study group) were those episodes appearing after 1996 (when the first severe cases appeared) and historic controls were episodes occurring before 1996. RESULTS: In the study group, 18 peritonitis episodes developed in 15 patients. In the control group, 31 peritonitis episodes developed in 20 patients. There were no significant differences in clinical presentation; however, the outcome was significantly poorer for the later period. A severe outcome occurred in 50% of study versus 10% of control patients. In fact, 68% of the episodes registered before 1996 were cured in 3 days or less. Concurring with this trend, the numbers of surgical interventions and catheter removals were also higher in the study group. Strikingly, E. coli did not show changes in in vitro susceptibility testing to antibiotics, although the in vivo response was much worse. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a change in the virulence of E. coli peritonitis episodes over the past 5 years leading to a high percentage of treatment failure, which does not depend on antibiotic sensitivity and seems to be dependent on changes in host response mechanisms.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2003 by Multimed Inc.