PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 23(4): 362-367 2003
© 2003 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahn, C
Right arrow Articles by Shin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahn, C
Right arrow Articles by Shin, S.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 23, Issue 4, 362-367
Copyright © 2003 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Effect of peritoneal dialysis on plasma and peritoneal fluid concentrations of isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and rifampin

C Ahn, KH Oh, K Kim, KY Lee, JG Lee, MD Oh, Y Kim, JS Han, S Kim, JS Lee, IJ Jang, and SG Shin

Department of Nephrology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to elucidate the pharmacokinetic profiles of antimycobacterial regimens for peritoneal dialysis patients. PATIENTS: Nine patients on maintenance continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) were included in this study. METHODS: After administering a conventional oral dose of antituberculosis medications, we measured plasma and peritoneal fluid concentrations of isoniazid by fluorometry, and rifampin and pyrazinamide by high performance liquid chromatography. The assay data were subjected to pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: Average peak plasma concentrations of isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide were 3.3 mg/L, 6.5 mg/L, and 30.9 mg/L, respectively, all of which much exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Peritoneal fluid concentrations of isoniazid and pyrazinamide were maintained well above the MICs for M. tuberculosis; however, peritoneal fluid concentration of rifampin was below the therapeutic range most of the time. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of systemic or pulmonary tuberculosis in CAPD patients, no dose adjustments are required for isoniazid, rifampin, or pyrazinamide. On the contrary, for the treatment of tuberculous peritonitis, oral rifampin therapy is not expected to be effective because of its low peritoneal fluid concentration.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2003 by Multimed Inc.