PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 23(2): 200-207 2003
© 2003 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tzamaloukas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bunting, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tzamaloukas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bunting, D
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 23, Issue 2, 200-207
Copyright © 2003 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Case Reports

A 100-kg man on peritoneal dialysis (PD) with a borderline kt/V: to PD or not to PD

AH Tzamaloukas and D Bunting

Renal Section, New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108, USA. Tzamalouka@aol.com

The determinants of the PD prescription for adequate dialysis are residual renal clearance, target clearance, patient size (gender, height, weight, and, in men only, age), and some information about peritoneal transport characteristics, usually obtained from a PET (anticipated D/P, anticipated Vuf). With this information, PD schedules providing adequate clearances can be calculated for most large anuric patients. This is part of the information that should be provided to large patients before they decide on their dialysis modality. If the patient chooses PD, dialysis prescription may need to be modified over time and one must be attentive to the patient's needs to prevent burnout.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2003 by Multimed Inc.