PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 22(6): 698-704 2002
© 2002 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hills, B.
Right arrow Articles by LaMont, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hills, B.
Right arrow Articles by LaMont, A.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 22, Issue 6, 698-704
Copyright © 2002 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Clinical Trial

Spatial distribution of dialysate in patients and its implications to intradialysate diffusion

BA Hills, S Birch, Burke JR, and AC LaMont

Paediatric Respiratory Research Centre, Mater Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Q, Australia. 1prrap@mater.org.au

OBJECTIVE: To visualize and quantify the spatial distribution of dialysate in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and, hence, estimate diffusion times for fluid "pockets" wherever intradialysate concentration gradients may not be dissipated by convective currents. DESIGN: Contrast medium was added to the dialysate of three supine CAPD patients before an exchange prior to computed tomographic (CT) scanning. Spatial information in the CT scanner was then downloaded to other computers and processed to produce impressive three-dimensional models of dialysate distribution using "wire frame technology." RESULTS: Models differed between patients but all demonstrated pooling of dialysate in the paracolic gutters, subphrenic space, and, especially, in the pelvic cavity. Some pockets of fluid were almost isolated. Quantitatively, the models can account for over 80% of the volume of the exchange (2.5 L), displaying an effective area of contact of 913-450 cm2 between parietal peritoneum and dialysate. This amounts to only 11% -21% of the anatomic area, again emphasizing the uneven distribution of dialysate. Ignoring very thin (< 0.1 mm) films of dialysate, the bulk (80%) had mean thicknesses ranging from 1.6 to 1.9 cm. Transcendental equations for bulk diffusion were then applied to these findings to determine a theoretical time for urea of about 2-3 hours to half-saturation, or 5-7 hours to 80% saturation, in the absence of convective currents. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of dialysate within the peritoneal cavity is very uneven, resulting in long diffusion times in fluid pockets wherever convective currents may be minimal. Hence, intradialysate diffusion should not be ignored when modeling peritoneal dialysis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2002 by Multimed Inc.