PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 22(3): 335-338 2002
© 2002 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ariano, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zelenitsky, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ariano, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zelenitsky, S.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 22, Issue 3, 335-338
Copyright © 2002 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Challenging the current treatment paradigm for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients

RE Ariano, C Franczuk, A Fine, GK Harding, and SA Zelenitsky

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manada.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze clinical outcomes of Staphylococcus epidermidis peritoneal dialysis peritonitis before and after an interventional switch from a vancomycin/ tobramycin to a cefazolin/tobramycin regimen for empiric treatment. To examine risk factors associated with clinical failure. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: A peritoneal dialysis program within a university-affiliated tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: 93 episodes of S. epidermidis peritonitis over a 6-year period. INTERVENTIONS: Clinical responses were compared between treatments using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify significant risk factors for clinical failure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in the overall response rates observed with vancomycin (40/49; 81.6%) and cefazolin (23/29; 79.3%) regimens for episodes of S. epidermidis peritonitis. Furthermore, the presence of methicillin resistance in 63 of 93 cases (67.7%) had no influence on clinical outcome, with response rates of 83.9% (26/31) and 82.4% (14/17) for empiric vancomycin and cefazolin regimens, respectively. Tobramycin therapy of less than 2 days was an independent risk factor for clinical failure in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 4.44, 95% confidence interval 1.28 - 15.48; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Empiric treatment with intraperitoneal cefazolin was as effective as vancomycin for S. epiderimidis peritonitis despite a high prevalence of methicillin resistance. Tobramycin therapy of less than 2 days was strongly associated with treatment failure.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2002 by Multimed Inc.