PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 22(2): 234-238 2002
© 2002 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, F
Right arrow Articles by Feneberg, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, F
Right arrow Articles by Feneberg, R
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 22, Issue 2, 234-238
Copyright © 2002 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Methodological issues in assessing the incidence of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis in children

F Schaefer, M Kandert, and R Feneberg

Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Children's Hospital, Ruperto-Carolus University, Heidelberg, Germany. Franz_Schaefer@med.uni-heidelberg.de

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the distribution of peritonitis incidence and assess the usefulness of patient-specific peritonitis rates in children. DESIGN: 49 children on automated peritoneal dialysis (PD) followed during a 2-year observation period. SETTING: Single-center, academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: 49 children aged 2 months to 18 years; 24 prevalent, 25 incident during the observation period. Cumulative observation time was 639 patient-months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cohort-specific peritonitis incidence, median patient-specific peritonitis incidence, mean peritonitis incidence by gamma-Poisson (negative binomial) modeling, peritonitis-free survival by Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis. RESULTS: 68 new peritonitis episodes and 21 relapses occurred in 27 patients.The distribution of patient-specific peritonitis incidence was bimodal, with a large group experiencing no or very few episodes, and another cluster around 1 episode per 6-9 months. Overall cohort-specific peritonitis incidence was 1.28, median subject-specific incidence 0.99, and mean incidence according to negative binomial modeling 1.04 (95% confidence interval 1.02-1.06) episodes per patient-year. Median peritonitis-free survival time was 6.9 months. In those patients who developed peritonitis, subject-specific peritonitis incidence was inversely correlated with patient age (r = -0.42, p < 0.05) and duration of chronic PD at last observation (r = -0.42, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Since the distribution of peritonitis in children is non-Gaussian, the average risk of peritonitis is more accurately expressed by the median of the individual subject-specific peritonitis rates or by the mean incidence estimate obtained by the negative binomial distribution model. The assignment of a personal peritonitis risk to each patient permits risk factor analysis by routine statistical methods, even in smaller populations.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2002 by Multimed Inc.