PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 22(1): 67-72 2002
© 2002 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tzamaloukas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Murata, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tzamaloukas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Murata, G.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 22, Issue 1, 67-72
Copyright © 2002 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Clinical Trial

A population-specific formula predicting creatinine excretion in continuous peritoneal dialysis

AH Tzamaloukas and GH Murata

Renal Section, New Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System, and University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque 87108, USA. Tzamaloukas.Antonios@albuquerque.va.gov

OBJECTIVE: The Cockroft-Gault formula was shown to systematically overestimate the decline in creatinine excretion with age in continuous peritoneal dialysis (CPD) patients and is, therefore, not suitable for studying creatinine excretion.The purpose of the present study was to develop and test a population-specific formula predicting average creatinine excretion in CPD. METHODS: Creatinine excretion in urine plus dialysate was measured in 925 CPD patients. Forty patients were excluded because of evidence of noncompliance. The remaining 885 subjects were randomly grouped into a derivation group (n = 432) and a validation group (n = 453). Stepwise multiple linear regression models were used to predict creatinine excretion in the derivation group. The candidate variables, chosen because they were previously shown to be predictors of creatinine excretion in CPD, included weight (W), age (A), gender (G), diabetes (D), and interaction terms between these four variables. Estimates of creatinine excretion from the best-fit regression formula (CrExcr1) and from the Cockroft-Gault formula (CrExcr2) were compared to creatinine excretion (CrExcr) in the validation group. RESULTS: The best-fit regression model in the derivation group included all four candidate variables (W, A, G, D), but no interaction terms. This model was as follows: CrExcr1 = 302.150 - 4.380A + 171.234G - 39.041D + 11.730W (r2 = 0.477, p < 0.001). In the validation set, CrExcr = -15.795 + 0.988CrExcr1 (r2 = 0.447, p < 0.001), and CrExcr = -303.823 + 0.732CrExcr2 (r2 = 0.340, p < 0.001). When the differences between measured and predicted creatinine excretion did not take into account the sign of each individual difference, CrExcr - CrExcr1 = 201 +/- 156 mg/24 hours, and CrExcr - CrExcr2 = 235 +/- 174 mg/24 hr (p < 0.001) in the validation group. When the sign of the difference was taken into account, CrExcr - CrExcr1 = -28 +/- 149 mg/24 hr, and CrExcr - CrExcr2 = 63 +/- 295 mg/24 hr (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A population-specific formula predicting creatinine excretion in CPD was derived.This formula has greater accuracy than the Cockroft-Gault formula and can be used in studies of creatinine excretion in CPD.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2002 by Multimed Inc.