PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 21(Suppl_3): 231-235 2001
© 2001 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Isbel, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Isbel, N.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 21, Issue Suppl_3, S231-S235
Copyright © 2001 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Oral versus intravenous iron supplementation in peritoneal dialysis patients

DW Johnson, KA Herzig, R Gissane, SB Campbell, CM Hawley, and NM Isbel

Department of Renal Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. david_johnson@health.qld.gov.au

The vast majority of erythropoietin (EPO)-treated peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients require iron supplementation. Most authors and clinical practice guidelines recommend primary oral iron supplementation in PD patients because it is more practical and less expensive. However, numerous studies have clearly demonstrated that oral iron therapy is unable to maintain EPO-treated PD patients in positive iron balance. Once patients become iron-deficient, intravenous iron administration has been found to more effectively augment iron stores and hematologic response than does oral therapy. We recently performed a prospective, cross-over trial in 28 iron-replete PD patients and showed that twice-monthly outpatient iron polymaltose infusions (200 mg) were a practical and safe alternative to oral iron. That treatment produced significant increases in hemoglobin concentration and body iron stores. The additional expense of intravenous iron therapy was completely offset by reductions in EPO dosage. Careful monitoring of iron stores is important in patients receiving intravenous iron supplementation in view of epidemiologic links with infection and cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, a growing body of evidence suggests that, as has been found for hemodialysis patients, intravenous iron therapy is superior to oral iron supplementation in EPO-treated PD patients.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2001 by Multimed Inc.