PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 21(5): 509-515 2001
© 2001 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jansen, M.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 21, Issue 5, 509-515
Copyright © 2001 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

The relationship between Kt/V(urea) and nPNA in anuric peritoneal dialysis patients: a comparison with predialysis patients

MA Jansen, JC Korevaar, FW Dekker, KJ Jager, EW Boeschoten, RT Krediet, and

Department of Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. mjansen@knmg.nl

OBJECTIVE: It is unknown whether a given level of urea clearance by the native kidneys provides better or similar control of uremia than the same level of urea clearance by continuous peritoneal dialysis (PD). More insight into possible differences between renal and peritoneal urea clearances is warranted. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between Kt/V(urea) and protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance normalized to body weight (nPNA), the relationship between urea clearance and creatinine appearance, and other nutritional parameters in PD patients without residual renal function, and in predialysis end-stage renal disease patients. PATIENTS: All patients participated in the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis. This is a prospective cohort study of incident dialysis patients, in whom regular assessments of renal function are done. A group of 75 PD patients was identified at the first follow-up assessment in which their urine production was less than 100 mL/day. These patients were considered the anuric group. This group was compared with a control group of 97 predialysis patients studied 0-4 weeks before the start of dialysis treatment. RESULTS: Linear relationships were present between Kt/V(urea) and nPNA, in both the predialysis patients and the anuric PD patients. A significant difference was present between the slopes of the two regression lines (0.40 vs 0.18, p = 0.007). When Kt/V(urea) exceeded 1.3/week, a given level of Kt/V(urea) was associated with a higher nPNA in predialysis than in anuric PD patients. Similar relationships were found between Kt(urea) and PNA. Kt(urea) was also significantly related to urine or dialysate creatinine appearance. A significant difference existed between the slopes of the regression lines in the two groups of patients (p < 0.001). A weekly Kt(urea) of 70 L was associated with a urine creatinine appearance of 11.0 mmol/day and a dialysate creatinine appearance of 8.4 mmol/day. Nutritional status measured with creatinine appearance and Subjective Global Assessment was better in the predialysis population, despite much lower values for Kt/V(urea) in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between Kt/V(urea) and nPNA in anuric PD patients is different from that in a predialysis population. It follows from our results that, when Kt/V(urea) is above 1.3/week, a given level of Kt/V(urea) is associated with a higher nPNA in predialysis than in anuric PD patients.This challenges the concept of equivalency between renal and peritoneal Kt/V(urea) with respect to control of uremic morbidity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. T. Krediet
The rise and fall of the Kt/V concept in CAPD
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 970 - 972.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2001 by Multimed Inc.