PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 21(4): 405-410 2001
© 2001 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sasal, J
Right arrow Articles by Bargman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sasal, J
Right arrow Articles by Bargman, J.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 21, Issue 4, 405-410
Copyright © 2001 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Late renal transplant failure: an adverse prognostic factor at initiation of peritoneal dialysis

J Sasal, D Naimark, J Klassen, J Shea, and JM Bargman

Division of Nephrology, The University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Early renal transplant failure necessitating a return to dialysis has been shown to be a poor prognostic factor for survival. Little is known about the outcome of patients with late transplant failure returning to dialysis. It was our clinical impression that late transplant failure (>2 months) carries an increased morbidity and mortality risk in patients returning to dialysis. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with a failed renal transplant have an outcome different to those on dialysis who have never received a kidney transplant. SETTING: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) unit in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: All failed renal transplant patients (fTx) in the Toronto Hospital Peritoneal Dialysis program between 1989 and 1996 were identified. This cohort of 42 fTx patients was compared with a cohort of randomly selected never-transplanted PD patients (non-Tx).The PD program was selected because of the availability of well-documented patient archival material. The non-Tx group was matched for age and presence of diabetes. Data were collected until retransplantation, change of dialysis modality or center, death, or until June 1998. RESULTS: There was no difference at initiation of PD between groups in serum albumin, residual renal function, or mean serum parathyroid hormone level. The mean low-density lipoprotein level was significantly higher in the fTx cohort. The duration of dialysis before Tx in fTx patients accounted for the increased total length of dialysis in fTx (mean 15 months). However, post-Tx the duration of PD was similar for both groups (30.7 months for fTx vs 31.6 months for non-Tx). The fTx group had a considerably worse outcome than the non-Tx group. The time to first peritonitis, subsequent episodes of peritonitis, catheter change, or transfer to hemodialysis occurred at a much faster rate in fTx patients.The most dramatic difference was in survival. There were 3 deaths in the non-Tx group and 12 in the fTx group (p < 0.01). The mean age at time of death in the fTx group was 47.5 years. Deaths were due mainly to gram-negative peritonitis and cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that late failed renal transplant patients starting dialysis are at increased risk of complications and have strikingly higher mortality rates than non-Tx patients. A previously failed kidney transplant can be considered an adverse prognostic factor for patients commencing PD; these patients need to be closely monitored. Although this study was limited to PD patients, the same principles likely apply to fTx patients returning to any form of renal replacement therapy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Messa, C. Ponticelli, and L. Berardinelli
Coming back to dialysis after kidney transplant failure
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2738 - 2742.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. de Jonge, B. Bammens, W. Lemahieu, B. D. Maes, and Y. Vanrenterghem
Comparison of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis after renal transplant failure
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1669 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. V. Badve, C. M. Hawley, S. P. McDonald, D. W. Mudge, J. B. Rosman, F. G. Brown, D. W. Johnson, and for The ANZDATA Registry PD Working Committee
Effect of previously failed kidney transplantation on peritoneal dialysis outcomes in the Australian and New Zealand patient populations
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 776 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. S. Rao, D. E. Schaubel, and R. Saran
Impact of graft failure on patient survival on dialysis: a comparison of transplant-naive and post-graft failure mortality rates
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 387 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2001 by Multimed Inc.