PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 21(4): 338-344 2001
© 2001 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kjellstrand, P
Right arrow Articles by Olsson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kjellstrand, P
Right arrow Articles by Olsson, L.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 21, Issue 4, 338-344
Copyright © 2001 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Degradation in peritoneal dialysis fluids may be avoided by using low pH and high glucose concentration

P Kjellstrand, E Martinson, A Wieslander, K Kjellstrand, E Jeppsson, E Svensson, L Jarkelid, T Linden, and LF Olsson

Gambro AB, Lund, Sweden. pk@gambro.com

OBJECTIVE: When glucose is present in a medical fluid, the heat applied during sterilization leads to degradation. The glucose degradation products (GDPs) give rise to bioincompatible reactions in peritoneal dialysis patients. The extent of the degradation depends on a number of factors, such as heating time, temperature, pH, glucose concentration, and catalyzing substances. In the present work, we investigated the influence of pH and concentration in order to determine how to decrease the amounts of GDPs produced. DESIGN: Glucose solutions (1%-60% glucose; pH 1-8) were heat sterilized at 121 degrees C. Ultraviolet (UV) absorption, aldehydes, pH, and inhibition of cell growth (ICG) were used as measures of degradation. RESULTS: Glucose degradation was minimum at an initial pH (prior to sterilization) of around 3.5 and at a high concentration of glucose. There was considerable development of acid degradation products during the sterilization process when the initial pH was high. Two different patterns of development of UV-absorbing degradation products were seen: one below pH 3.5, dominated by the formation of 5-hydroxy-methyl-2-furaldehyde (5-HMF); and one above, dominated by degradation products absorbing at 228 nm. 3-Deoxyglucosone (3-DG) concentration and the portion of 228 nm UV absorbance not caused by 5-HMF were found to relate to the in vitro bioincompatibility measured as ICG; there was no relation between 5-HMF or absorbance at 284 nm and bioincompatibility. CONCLUSION: In order to minimize the development of bioincompatible GDPs in peritoneal dialysis fluids during heat sterilization, pH should be kept around 3.2 and the concentration of glucose should be high. 5-HMF and 284 nm UV absorbance are not reliable as quality measures. 3-DG and the portion of UV absorbance at 228 nm caused by degradation products other than 5-HMF seem to be reliable indicators of bioincompatibility.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2001 by Multimed Inc.