PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 21(3): 306-312 2001
© 2001 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Wit, G.
Right arrow Articles by de Charro, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Wit, G.
Right arrow Articles by de Charro, F.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 21, Issue 3, 306-312
Copyright © 2001 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

A comparison of quality of life of patients on automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

GA de Wit, MP Merkus, RT Krediet, and FT de Charro

Sanders Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. ardine.de.wit@rivm.nl

OBJECTIVE: Data on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients are scarce. The objectives of this study were (1) to explore HRQOL of APD patients and compare it with HRQOL of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients and a general population sample, and (2) to study the relationship between HROOL assessment outcomes and background variables. DESIGN: Home interviews of APD and CAPD patients. HRQOL, social-demographic, clinical, and treatment-related background data were collected at the interview and from patient charts. Multiple regression analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to study the relationship of HRQOL assessment outcomes with background variables. SETTING: Sixteen Dutch dialysis centers. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 37 APD patients and 59 CAPD patients matched for total time on dialysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Four HRQOL instruments: Short-Form 36, EuroQol EQ-5D, Standard Gamble, and Time Trade Off. RESULTS: Physical functioning of both APD and CAPD patients was impaired compared with the general population; mental functioning was not different. In multivariate analyses, the mental health of APD patients was found to be better than that of CAPD patients. In addition, APD patients were less anxious and depressed than CAPD patients. With respect to physical aspects of HRQOL and role-functioning, no differences were observed between APD and CAPD patients. Other variables to explain HRQOL assessment outcomes were age, the number of comorbid diseases, and primary kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: HRQOL of APD patients is at least equal to HRQOL of CAPD patients.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2001 by Multimed Inc.