PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 20(6): 757-765 2000
© 2000 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crabtree, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crabtree, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, A
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 20, Issue 6, 757-765
Copyright © 2000 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

A laparoscopic approach under local anesthesia for peritoneal dialysis access

JH Crabtree and A Fishman

Department of Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Bellflower Medical Center, 90706, USA. John.H.Crabtree@kp.org

OBJECTIVE: Presented herein is a technical description of a time-proven laparoscopic approach to establishing successful long-term peritoneal dialysis access. DESIGN: Using a two-port technique, the peritoneal catheter is inserted through a paramedian port site while continuously monitoring the implant procedure with a laparoscope from a second port location. A long rectus sheath tunnel created with a nontrocar port device keeps the dialysis catheter oriented toward the pelvis. Helium abdominal insufflation enables full surgical laparoscopy under local anesthesia. Validation of the effectiveness of the technique is made by comparison to previous implantation experience using an open dissection method. PATIENTS: Laparoscopic implantation of peritoneal catheters was performed in 150 patients, and placement by open dissection was accomplished in 63 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The incidence of complications and revision-free catheter survival between implantation methods were compared. RESULTS: Catheters implanted laparoscopically had a significantly lower incidence of flow dysfunction (p < 0.05) and better survival (p < 0.001) than those placed by open dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to implantation by open dissection, the laparoscopic approach provides the patient reduced perioperative discomfort. The procedure can be performed safely with the patient under local anesthesia on an ambulatory basis. Laparoscopic implantation significantly reduces the incidence of catheter flow dysfunction and permits simultaneous identification and correction of other problems that could complicate dialysis therapy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Santarelli, M. Zeiler, R. Marinelli, T. Monteburini, A. Federico, and E. Ceraudo
Videolaparoscopy as rescue therapy and placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a thirty-two case single centre experience
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1348 - 1354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2000 by Multimed Inc.