PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 20(6): 662-666 2000
© 2000 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bastani, B
Right arrow Articles by Boroujerdi, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bastani, B
Right arrow Articles by Boroujerdi, N
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 20, Issue 6, 662-666
Copyright © 2000 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Iron absorption after single pharmacological oral iron loading test in patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis and in healthy volunteers

B Bastani, S Islam, and N Boroujerdi

Division of Nephrology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. bastanib@slu.edu

OBJECTIVE: Oral iron is poorly absorbed in chronic dialysis patients. We tested the hypothesis that a superpharmacologic dose of iron sulfate (260 mg elemental iron) administered on an empty stomach results in significant iron absorption in these patients. DESIGN: A prospective open controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient department of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Nine stable chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and seven normal control subjects. METHOD: All subjects ingested a single dose of 4 tablets of iron sulfate (260 mg elemental iron total) in the morning while fasting. OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum iron concentrations at baseline, and at 2 and 4 hours after the oral dose were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The control group showed a significant rise in mean [standard error (SE)] serum iron concentration, from a baseline value of 76.5 +/- 7 microg/dL to 191 +/- 10.5 microg/dL at 2 hours and to 190 +/- 24 microg/dL at 4 hours. This result represents a percentage rise of 164% +/- 32% at 2 hours and 152% +/- 28.5% at 4 hours. In the PD patients, a significant rise in serum iron concentration was also seen, from a baseline value of 64 +/- 8 microg/dL to 130 +/- 3 microg/dL at 2 hours and 111 +/- 18 microg/dL at 4 hours. This result represents a percentage rise of 105% = 29% at 2 hours and 77% +/- 23.5% at 4 hours. However, the absolute change in serum iron concentration in PD patients at 2 and 4 hours was approximately equal to 50% of the change in control subjects at those time points. None of the PD patients experienced gastrointestinal side effects; 4 control subjects experienced mild side effects. CONCLUSION: Despite impaired oral iron absorption in chronic dialysis patients, a large pharmacologic dose given orally can result in significant iron absorption and may prove to be a more efficient means of oral iron supplementation therapy in these patients.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2000 by Multimed Inc.