PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 20(4): 412-417 2000
© 2000 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Vecchi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ponticelli, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Vecchi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ponticelli, C
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 20, Issue 4, 412-417
Copyright © 2000 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Preliminary evaluation of incremental peritoneal dialysis in 25 patients

AF De Vecchi, A Scalamogna, S Finazzi, P Colucci, and C Ponticelli

Peritoneal Dialysis Program, Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Italy. deveccpd@polic.cilea.it

BACKGROUND: Incremental dialysis has been suggested for patients with some residual renal function. However, very little published clinical data exist on the feasibility of this schedule. OBJECTIVES: To assess feasibility of incremental dialysis, with regard to its effect, complications, and impact on quality of life. DESIGN: Pilot prospective study, not controlled. SETTING: Nephrology division, public clinical research hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-five patients (19 men, mean age 61+/-13 years, body weight 63+/-11 kg) began peritoneal dialysis (the first treatment of uremia) with a single nightly exchange lasting 10 hours or 2 daily exchanges over 12 hours according to creatinine clearance and Kt/N. Patients gave informed consent and reported their work activity, degree of rehabilitation, and their quality of life by answering a questionnaire prepared for this purpose. OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival rate, complications related to peritoneal dialysis, and residual renal and peritoneal clearances. RESULTS: During the study period no patient died. Complications related to dialysis were peritonitis (0.41 episodes/year) and exit-site infection (0.32 episodes/year). All patients continued to work with full rehabilitation and considered 1 or 2 exchanges per day less troublesome than 3 or 4. CONCLUSIONS: Incremental dialysis is well accepted by patients and staff. This technique does not involve a high risk of complications and is economical. Therefore incremental dialysis is feasible.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. Gokal
Peritoneal Dialysis in the 21st Century: An Analysis of Current Problems and Future Developments
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2002; 13(90001): S104 - 115.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 2000 by Multimed Inc.