PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 19(Suppl_2): 212-216 1999
© 1999 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, T
Right arrow Articles by Lindholm, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, T
Right arrow Articles by Lindholm, B
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 19, Issue Suppl_2, S212-S216
Copyright © 1999 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

A simple and fast method to estimate peritoneal membrane transport characteristics using dialysate sodium concentration

T Wang, J Waniewski, O Heimburger, J Bergstrom, A Werynski, and B Lindholm

Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

BACKGROUND: The peritoneal equilibration test (PET) is widely used to classify a patient's peritoneal transport characteristics. However, PET is laborious and the prediction of fluid removal based on PET is generally poor. It is believed that osmosis by glucose occurs partially through transcellular water channels, resulting in sieving of sodium and decrease of dialysate sodium concentration when using hypertonic glucose dialysate. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the possibility of using dialysate sodium concentration to classify the patient's peritoneal transport characteristics. METHODS: A 6-hour dwell study with frequent dialysate and plasma sampling was performed in 46 patients using 2 L of 3.86% glucose dialysate with 131I-albumin as an intraperitoneal volume (IPV) marker. The peritoneal transport of sodium, creatinine, glucose, and fluid was evaluated. RESULTS: The dialysate sodium concentration at 240 min (D(Na240)) significantly correlated with D/P creatinine (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) and D/D0 glucose (r = -0.83, p < 0.001) at 240 min of the dwell (better than dialysate sodium concentration at any other time of the dwell). DNa240 also significantly correlated with IPV at 240 min of the dwell (r = -0.61, p < 0.001)(better than D/P creatinine and D/D0 glucose). There were significant correlations between D(Na240) and the sodium-sieving coefficient (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) and the diffusive mass transfer coefficient for sodium (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). When using D(Na240) to divide the patients into four groups, as in the PET method, no significant difference was found between the two methods. CONCLUSION: Using 3.86% glucose solution, D(Na240) can be used instead of D/P creatinine to classify patients into different transport groups. D(Na240) provides a better prediction of peritoneal fluid transport and reflects both the diffusive and convective transport properties of the membrane. As only one dialysate sample (and no blood sample) is needed, D(Na240) may offer important clinical advantages compared with PET.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1999 by Multimed Inc.