PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 19(Suppl_2): 102-105 1999
© 1999 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flessner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lofthouse, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flessner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lofthouse, J
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 19, Issue Suppl_2, S102-S105
Copyright © 1999 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Blood flow does not limit peritoneal transport

MF Flessner and J Lofthouse

Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York 14642, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the assumption that blood flow to the microvessels underlying the peritoneum does not limit solute or water exchange between the blood and the dialysis fluid. DESIGN: Small plastic chambers were affixed to the serosal side of the liver, cecum, stomach, and abdominal wall of anesthetized rats. Solutions that contained labeled solutes or that were made hypertonic were placed into the chambers, which restricted the area of transfer across the tissue to the base of the chamber and which permitted calculation of mass or water transfer rates on the basis of area. The local blood flow was monitored continuously with a laser Doppler flowmeter during three periods of observation: control, after 50%-70% reduction of the blood flow, and postmortem. RESULTS: Urea transfer across all serosa, except for the liver, showed no difference in mean mass transfer coefficient (cm/min) between control (0.0038-0.0046) and after 70% flow reduction (0.0037-0.0040), but demonstrated a significant decrease with blood flow equal to zero (0.0020). These tissues demonstrated small but insignificant decreases in osmotic water flow into the chamber (0.7-0.9 microL/min/cm2 under control conditions versus 0.4-0.7 microL/min/cm2 with reduced blood flow). The liver demonstrated limitations in water and solute transport with a 70% decrease in blood flow. CONCLUSION: Because the liver makes up a small part of the peritoneal area, we conclude that large drops in blood flow do not limit overall solute or water transfer across the peritoneum during dialysis, and therefore acute peritoneal dialysis may be an appropriate modality for ICU patients in shock and renal failure.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1999 by Multimed Inc.