PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 19(5): 442-450 1999
© 1999 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 19, Issue 5, 442-450
Copyright © 1999 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Peritoneal transport of glucose in rat

MS Park, EY Lee, GI Suh, J Waniewski, A Werynski, and HB Lee

Department of Internal Medicine, Soon Chun Hyang University, Seoul, Korea.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the convective transport characteristics of glucose and the effect of high glucose and insulin during experimental peritoneal dialysis in rat. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 300-400 g were used in this study. Mannitol (5%) was used as osmotic agent. Glucose was added to dialysis solution to yield a concentration of 100 mg/dL (group 1) or 300 mg/dL (group 2). Mannitol solution (5%) containing the same concentration of electrolytes and lactate but without glucose was used as control (group 3). In group 2, blood sugar was maintained at approximately 300 mg/dL by continuous intravenous infusion of 25% glucose solution and 0.9% NaCl solution. A 2-hour dwell study was performed with 30 mL of test solutions. Intraperitoneal volume was calculated by volume marker (18.5 kBq of 131I-human radioiodinated serum albumin, RISA) dilution with corrections made for the elimination of RISA from the peritoneal cavity (K(E)) and sample volume. The diffusive mass transport coefficient (K(BD)) and sieving coefficient (S(BRF)) were calculated by using the Babb-Randerson-Farrell model. S was also calculated directly by using isocratic methods (S(I)).The peritoneal fluid absorption rate (K(E)) was taken into account for the calculation of S(I). RESULTS: Intraperitoneal volume was significantly higher in group 2 compared with groups 1 and 3. Peritoneal fluid absorption rate, K(E), was similar in all three groups. S(BRF) and S(I) for glucose were significantly lower in group 2 compared with groups 1 and 3. S(BRF) for glucose in group 2 was below zero and S(I) near zero. K(BD) for glucose was significantly higher in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3. Plasma and dialysate concentrations of insulin increased during the initial hour and then decreased to the baseline value in groups 1 and 3, while in group 2 it continuously increased. CONCLUSION: Significantly lower sieving coefficients for glucose in the high glucose and high insulin group suggest that transport mechanisms other than simple passive transport are involved in peritoneal glucose transport, and that high glucose per se and/or high insulin may be important factors that determine glucose transport characteristics.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1999 by Multimed Inc.