PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 19(4): 380-385 1999
© 1999 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwamoto, M
Right arrow Articles by Nakashima, Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwamoto, M
Right arrow Articles by Nakashima, Y
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 19, Issue 4, 380-385
Copyright © 1999 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Elimination of iomeprol in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

M Iwamoto, K Hiroshige, T Suda, T Ohta, A Ohtani, and Y Nakashima

Second Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Environmental and Occupational Health, Kitakyushu City, Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the elimination of iomeprol, its safety in clinical use, and its peritoneal permeability in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients with variable degrees of residual renal function (RRF). DESIGN: A nonrandomized comparison study. SETTING: Hospitalized patients in CAPD unit of Chikuho and University Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen patients treated by CAPD and 6 by hemodialysis (HD). INTERVENTIONS: Total dialysate, blood, and 24-hour urine collections were obtained for 4 consecutive days after the administration of iomeprol. A peritoneal equilibration test was performed just before and after the administration of iomeprol. MEASUREMENTS: Iomeprol (iodine) concentration was measured. Residual renal function was estimated as the mean of renal creatinine and urea clearances. Dialysate-to-plasma ratios (D/P) of creatinine and iomeprol were also determined. RESULTS: In all CAPD patients, plasma iomeprol clearance was markedly slow, with a biological half-life (T1/2) of over 32 hours. However, no patients suffered from any adverse effects, and over 80% of plasma iomeprol was eliminated during the 4-hour HD. The plasma iomeprol elimination rate was significantly higher from 4 hours after the iomeprol administration in CAPD patients with RRF [mean estimated creatinine clearance (CCr) 3.8 mL/min, n = 7] compared to the remaining patients (mean estimated CCr 0.6 mL/min, n = 7); however, T1/2 in patients with RRF was over 24 hours. D/P creatinine was significantly correlated with D/P iomeprol, and peritoneal iomeprol permeability may depend on an individual's peritoneal solute transport properties. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged elimination rate of iomeprol was documented in our CAPD patients both with and without RRF. A HD procedure or intensive peritoneal dialysis just after the use of iomeprol may be advisable to promptly remove circulating iomeprol.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1999 by Multimed Inc.