PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 19(3): 237-247 1999
© 1999 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qamar, I.
Right arrow Articles by Balfe, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qamar, I.
Right arrow Articles by Balfe, J.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 19, Issue 3, 237-247
Copyright © 1999 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Clinical Trial

Effects of amino acid dialysis compared to dextrose dialysis in children on continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis

IU Qamar, D Secker, L Levin, JA Balfe, S Zlotkin, and JW Balfe

Division of Pediatric Nephrology, The Hospital for sick Children and the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the biochemical and nutritional effects of amino acid dialysis with dextrose dialysis in children receiving continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD). DESIGN: A prospective randomized cross-over study. SETTING: Nonhospitalized patients. PATIENTS: Seven children aged 1.8 to 16.0 years (mean 8.1 years) with end-stage renal disease who were receiving CCPD. INTERVENTIONS: Each patient received nighttime automated CCPD of dextrose, plus a single daytime dwell of either amino acid dialysate or dextrose dialysate. After 3 months, subjects crossed over to the alternative regimen for a subsequent 3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Creatinine clearance, ultrafiltration, urea, creatinine, electrolytes, total protein, albumin, fasting plasma amino acids, anthropometrics, total body nitrogen. RESULTS: Amino acid dialysis was comparable to dextrose dialysis for creatinine clearance and ultrafiltration. Plasma urea concentrations were higher during amino acid dialysis. No clinical side effects or worsening of metabolic acidosis was observed. Caloric intake increased and protein intake improved. Appetite and total body nitrogen increased in at least half the children during amino acid dialysis.Total plasma protein and albumin concentrations did not change significantly. Fasting plasma concentrations of amino acids after 3 months of amino acid dialysis were comparable to baseline values. For several amino acids, the dose-response curve was blunted after a single amino acid exchange following 3 months of amino acid dialysis, which may, in part, be due to the induction of hepatic enzyme synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Amino acid dialysis is an efficient form of peritoneal dialysis that should be considered for children with poor nutritional status for whom enteral nutrition supplementation has been unsuccessful. Further study is needed to determine the optimal amount of amino acids to deliver, the best time to administer the amino acid dialysis fluid, and the benefits of adding dextrose to the amino acid solution.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1999 by Multimed Inc.