PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 18(5): 512-515 1998
© 1998 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marx, M.
Right arrow Articles by Golper, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marx, M.
Right arrow Articles by Golper, T.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 18, Issue 5, 512-515
Copyright © 1998 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Plasma iohexol clearance in automated peritoneal dialysis--its role in adequacy determination

MA Marx, CL Shuler, and TA Golper

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relationship of plasma iohexol clearance to standard adequacy measures in an automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) population. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, open label, simultaneous clearance studies of novel (iohexol) and traditional (urea and creatinine) markers of dialysis quantitation. SETTING: Outpatient peritoneal dialysis units associated with tertiary care university hospitals. PATIENTS: Eighteen stable patients, 13 undergoing continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) and 5 receiving intermittent dialysis, who underwent 24-hour clearance studies were enrolled in and completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: Each subject received 15 mL of iohexol intravenously the morning of a scheduled dialysis night. Blood was obtained for determination of serum concentrations of urea nitrogen and creatinine, and plasma iohexol concentration. Dialysate and urine were collected over 24 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Urea and creatinine data from the total pooled dialysate and from the 24-hour urine collection were used to calculate daily Kt/Vurea and normalized total daily creatinine clearance (CrCl). Total plasma iohexol clearance was calculated using a one-compartment model with the Brochner-Mortensen correction. RESULTS: Normalized [to 1.73 m2 body surface area (BSA)] iohexol clearance correlated very well with normalized CrCl (r2 = 0.777; p < 0.001). A weaker correlation was observed between Kt/Vurea and normalized iohexol clearance (r2 = 0.213; 0.05 < p < 0.1). When data are not normalized using BSA or urea distribution volume, the regressions are improved for both creatinine (r2 = 0.820) and urea (r2 = 0.533). These results were comparable between those on CCPD and those on intermittent therapy. CONCLUSION: Total plasma iohexol clearance provides a simple assessment for APD adequacy by eliminating collection problems inherent to the methodologies currently employed. Such simplicity allows for more frequent assessments of delivered dialysis dose and efficacy of prescription changes.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1998 by Multimed Inc.