PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 18(5): 489-496 1998
© 1998 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flanigan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rocco, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flanigan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rocco, M.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 18, Issue 5, 489-496
Copyright © 1998 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

1996 Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study: report on nutritional indicators

MJ Flanigan, GR Bailie, DL Frankenfield, PR Frederick, BF Prowant, and MV Rocco

Department of Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The 1996 Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study illustrates the conduct of peritoneal dialysis in the United States during 1996. DESIGN AND PATIENT POPULATION: The survey is a medical records audit of 1317 randomly selected adult U.S.A. Medicare patients using peritoneal dialysis during 1996. OUTCOME MEASURES: Abstracted data included basic demographic characteristics, dialysis prescription, delivered dialysis dose, residual renal function, serum albumin, hematocrit, anemia management, and patient status. RESULTS: The survey included 785 patients using continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 423 using automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) primarily in the form of continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD). Except for the prescription mechanics and a greater likelihood that African-Americans would use CAPD, the groups did not differ substantially from one another. Evaluation of patient weight (W), body mass index (BMI), residual renal function, average serum albumin, protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance (nPNA), and dialysis efficiency as weekly fractional urea nitrogen removal (wKt/Vurea) and weekly creatinine clearance (wCrCl) revealed a picture of reasonable dialysis delivery and marginal protein nutrition. Additionally, there was little evidence that "dialysis efficiency," over the range assessed, had a major influence on nutritional status. Despite a tendency toward obesity (body weight = 76.6+/-20.0 kg and BMI = 27+/-7), 47% of patients had an average serum albumin below"normal" (3.5 g/dL by bromcresol green) and 70% had a nPNA below 1.0 g/kg/day. CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal dialysis patients appear to have marginal protein reserves despite surfeit energy stores.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. J. JAGER, M. P. MERKUS, R. M. HUISMAN, E. W. BOESCHOTEN, F. W. DEKKER, J. C. KOREVAAR, J. G. P. TIJSSEN, and R. T. KREDIET
Nutritional Status over Time in Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2001; 12(6): 1272 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1998 by Multimed Inc.