PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 18(4): 429-432 1998
© 1998 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadimeri, H
Right arrow Articles by Nyberg, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadimeri, H
Right arrow Articles by Nyberg, G
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 18, Issue 4, 429-432
Copyright © 1998 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

CAPD in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

H Hadimeri, AC Johansson, B Haraldsson, and G Nyberg

Department of Nephrology, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, Goteborg, Sweden.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there are specific complications to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) due to defects in various wall structures--causing hernia and diverticulitis--and to enlarged kidneys. DESIGN: The clinical experience of CAPD in 26 patients with ADPKD, treated for 11+/-6 months, was studied in retrospect and compared with that of 26 contemporary controls. Medical records were reviewed with respect to survival in this treatment form and any complication. Peritoneal dialysis capacity (PDC), as measured in 21 ADPKD patients and 20 controls, was also evaluated. SETTING: University Hospital. RESULTS: Before initiation of CAPD, enlarged kidneys necessitated nephrectomy in 2 of 26 ADPKD patients; both cases were registered as preparation for transplantation, not for CAPD. Survival in CAPD was similar in ADPKD patients and controls. Hernia was present in 4 ADPKD patients and 2 controls, and required transfer to hemodialysis in 1 patient from each group, temporarily. The incidence of peritonitis was 1 per 20 months in ADPKD patients versus 1 in 27 months in the controls, not significantly different. Peritonitis was caused by colonic bacteria in similar numbers. Residual renal function was 1.9 2.1 mL/min per 1.73 m2 in ADPKD patients versus 1.9+/-1.4 mL/min per 1.73 m2 in the controls. No difference was detected in any of the variables measured by PDC. CONCLUSION: There were no specific problems related to ADPKD.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1998 by Multimed Inc.