PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 18(4): 415-418 1998
© 1998 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B
Right arrow Articles by Porteous, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B
Right arrow Articles by Porteous, C
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 18, Issue 4, 415-418
Copyright © 1998 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Tenckhoff catheter salvage by closed stiff-wire manipulation without fluoroscopic control

B Jones, K McLaughlin, RA Mactier, and C Porteous

Department of Surgery, Stobhill NHS Hospital Trust, Glasgow, UK.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of Tenckhoff catheter salvage by a modified, closed, stiff-wire manipulation technique without the use of general anesthesia or fluoroscopy, and compare this with previously described techniques. DESIGN: Retrospective study in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) over a 41-month period. SETTING: Renal unit in an inner city hospital. PATIENTS: Eighteen patients using CAPD who had 22 episodes of outflow failure due to radiologically confirmed malposition of straight two-cuff Tenckhoff catheters. INTERVENTIONS: Closed stiff-wire manipulation of malpositioned Tenckhoff catheter without the use of general anesthesia or fluoroscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Initial success rate of manipulation, catheter and technique (CAPD) survival, and procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Catheter manipulation was technically successful in 21 of 22 cases. An additional six episodes of malposition occurred ranging from 2 to 630 days after the primary manipulation (median 7 days). A second manipulation was carried out in four cases that resulted in long-term success in two. Three patients were forced to discontinue CAPD for reasons other than catheter malposition, and the overall success rate at 1 month (patient successfully performing CAPD) was 59.1% (+/-0.1%). No major complications were experienced during the procedure and no episodes of peritonitis occurred. CONCLUSION: The technique described is relatively straightforward, does not require fluoroscopy or general anesthetic, and its success is comparable to previously reported methods of Tenckhoff catheter salvage. We would recommend this technique of catheter salvage in patients with Tenckhoff catheter malposition in whom conservative treatment has failed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1998 by Multimed Inc.