PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 18(2): 204-209 1998
© 1998 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saha, H.
Right arrow Articles by Pasternack, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saha, H.
Right arrow Articles by Pasternack, A.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 18, Issue 2, 204-209
Copyright © 1998 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Pharmacokinetics of clodronate in peritoneal dialysis patients

HH Saha, IO Ala-Houhala, SH Liukko-Sipi, P Ylitalo, and AI Pasternack

University of Tampere, Medical School, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.

OBJECTIVE: To study the pharmacokinetics of clodronate in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). DESIGN: A single intravenous dose pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Ten CAPD patients (3 female, 7 male, age 39-79 year, median 55). METHODS: Clodronate disodium in serum, urine, and dialysate was collected for 24 hours and analyzed by capillary gas chromatography with mass-selective detection. RESULTS: Only 7% of the infused dose of clodronate was eliminated through peritoneal dialysis during 24 hours. Clearance via CAPD (CL[CAPD]) was 2.4 +/- 0.6 mL/min, which was less than 10% of the total serum clearance (CL(tot), 26.0 +/- 19.3 mL/min). Even the kidneys were a more important route of elimination than CAPD in those patients with residual diuresis of more than 500 mL/24 hr. However, in all patients most of the clodronate serum clearance (77% +/- 13%) took place via routes other than peritoneal dialysis or kidneys, that is, via nonrenal-non-CAPD clearance (CL[NRD]). CL(NRD) most likely represents the part of the drug deposited in the skeleton. There was a positive correlation between CL(NRD) and the plasma intact parathyroid hormone concentration. CONCLUSIONS: CAPD removed clodronate poorly from the circulation. Most clearance took place via routes other than CAPD or kidneys. This CL(NRD) most likely represents the skeletal deposition of the drug, and this is related to the severity of hyperparathyroidism. When treating CAPD patients with hyperparathyroid bone disease, the administration of clodronate should be adjusted as in those subjects with severe renal failure.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1998 by Multimed Inc.