PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 18(1): 60-63 1998
© 1998 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pecoits-Filho, R.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pecoits-Filho, R.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, H
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 18, Issue 1, 60-63
Copyright © 1998 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

The effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on the healing of exit sites of peritoneal dialysis catheters in rats

RF Pecoits-Filho, ZJ Twardowski, R Khanna, YL Kim, S Goel, and H Moore

Department of Medicine, Dalton Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia 65212, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of intraperitoneal (i.p.) antibiotic (AB) prophylaxis on the quality of healing and infection rates of exit sites in peritoneal dialysis catheters. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-one Sprague-Dawley rats were dialyzed 3 times per day for 6 weeks. Dianeal solution containing AB was used for all the rats during the first 5 days. The animals were randomized on the sixth day into three groups: group A (AB-free after randomization), group B (AB for 3 weeks), and group C (AB during 6 weeks). Scores were given to each exit site according to the observation. Mean scores from each group were compared in an attempt to find significant differences between the groups. Dialysate and exit-site drainage samples were taken weekly for microbiology. RESULTS: Eight episodes of peritonitis were diagnosed, six in group A and two in group B. The most common bacteria causing peritonitis were gram-negative rods. The mean scores were not significantly different between groups C and B throughout the study, even after the discontinuation of the prophylaxis. Group A, when compared to the other two groups, had significantly higher scores after the second week and throughout the rest of the study. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal antibiotic prophylaxis for 3 weeks after catheter implantation is an effective way to prevent early colonization of exit sites, providing a better healing quality and lower incidence of catheter-related infection. Although the extension of the prophylaxis for 6 weeks seems to be beneficial, it was not statistically proven in this study.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1998 by Multimed Inc.