PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 17(4): 338-342 1997
© 1997 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernardini, J
Right arrow Articles by Piraino, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernardini, J
Right arrow Articles by Piraino, B
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 17, Issue 4, 338-342
Copyright © 1997 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Measuring compliance with prescribed exchanges in CAPD and CCPD patients

J Bernardini and B Piraino

University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To measure compliance with prescribed exchanges in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) patients using inventories of home dialysis supplies; to determine the reliability of the ratio of measured to predicted creatinine (M/P) in predicting compliance with prescribed exchanges; to determine the effects of the ingestion of performed creatine on the excretion of creatinine. DESIGN: A prospective analysis. SETTING: A university dialysis center. PATIENTS: Twenty patients on home peritoneal dialysis (PD). MEASUREMENTS: An inventory of supplies during two home visits over a 4-8 week interval determined the number of PD exchanges performed. This number was divided by the number of exchanges prescribed for the period to determine the percent compliance. Three consecutive days of the dialysate and urine were measured with all food consumed recorded during those days. M/P creatinine ratios and dietary protein intake (DPI) for each day were calculated. RESULTS: Of the patients tested, 8/20 (4%) were found to be noncompliant with the prescribed number of exchanges based on the home visits inventories, performing a mean of 75% of their exchanges. There was no significant difference in the M/P creatinine ratios of compliant and noncompliant patients, nor were the M/P ratios distributed differently for compliant and noncompliant patients. The M/P ratios did not vary significantly over the past 3 days. There was no correlation between the measured creatinine on a given day and the DPI for the same day. CONCLUSION: Based on assessment of the patient's inventory, 40% of the patients studied were noncompliant with their prescribed exchanges, indicating this is a serious and common problem in PD patients. The M/P creatinine ratio is not a predictor of compliance in PD. We suggest that use of home visit inventories to assess compliance in PD patients.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1997 by Multimed Inc.