PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 17(3): 269-272 1997
© 1997 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bezerra, D.
Right arrow Articles by Barretti, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bezerra, D.
Right arrow Articles by Barretti, P
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 17, Issue 3, 269-272
Copyright © 1997 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

The diagnostic value of Gram stain for initial identification of the etiologic agent of peritonitis in CAPD patients

DA Bezerra, MB Silva, JS Caramori, MF Sugizaki, T Sadatsune, AC Montelli, and P Barretti

Division of Nephrology, Botucatu Medical School, Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Gram stain in the initial diagnosis of the etiologic agent of peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). DESIGN: Retrospective study analyzing the sensitivity (S), specificity (SS), positive predictive value (+PV), and negative predictive value (-PV) of the Gram stain relating to the results of cultures in 149 episodes of peritonitis in CAPD. The data were analyzed in two studies. In the first, only the cases with detection of a single agent by Gram stain were taken (Study 1). In the second, only the cases with two agents in Gram stain were evaluated (Study 2). SETTING: Dialysis Unit and Laboratory of Microbiology of a tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Sixty-three patients on regular CAPD who presented one or more episodes of peritonitis from May 1992 to May 1995. RESULTS: The positivity of Gram stain was 93.2% and the sensitivity was 95.7%. The values of S, SS, +PV, and -PV were respectively: 94.9%, 53.5%, 68.3%, and 90.9% for gram-positive cocci and 83.3%, 98.8%, 95.2%, and 95.6% for gram-negative bacilli. The association of gram-positive cocci plus gram-negative bacilli were predictive of growth of both in 6.8%, growth of gram-positive cocci in 13.7%, and growth of gram-negative bacilli in 72.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The Gram stain is a method of great value in the initial diagnosis of the etiologic agent of peritonitis in CAPD, especially for gram-negative bacilli.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
P. G. Bowler, B. I. Duerden, and D. G. Armstrong
Wound Microbiology and Associated Approaches to Wound Management
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2001; 14(2): 244 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1997 by Multimed Inc.