PDI 2009 ISDP LAC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 17(3): 262-268 1997
© 1997 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, C.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, C.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, C.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 17, Issue 3, 262-268
Copyright © 1997 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Predialysis glycemic control is an independent predictor of clinical outcome in type II diabetics on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

CC Yu, MS Wu, CH Wu, CW Yang, JY Huang, JJ Hong, CY Fan Chiang, ML Leu, and CC Huang

Division of Nephrology, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between predialysis glycemic control and clinical outcomes for type II diabetic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). DESIGN: Sixty type II diabetic patients on CAPD were classified into 2 groups according to the status of glycemic control. In group G (good glycemic control), more than 50% of blood glucose determinations were within 3.3-11 mmol/L and the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level was within 5-10% at all times. In group P (poor glycemic control), fewer than 50% of blood glucose determinations were within 3.3-11 mmol/L or HbA1C level was above 10% at least once during the follow-up duration. In addition to glycemic control status, predialysis serum albumin, cholesterol levels, residual renal function, peritoneal membrane function, and the modes of glycemic control were also recorded. SETTING: Dialysis Unit, Department of Nephrology of a single university hospital. PATIENTS: From February 1988 to October 1995, 60 type II diabetic patients receiving CAPD for at least 3 months were enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidities before and during the dialysis period, patient survival, and causes of mortality. RESULTS: The patients with good glycemic control had significantly better survival than patients with poor glycemic control (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in predialysis morbidity between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in patient survival between the patients with serum albumin greater than 30 g/L and those with less than 30 g/L (p = 0.77), with cholesterol levels greater or less than 5.18 mmol/L (p = 0.73), and with different peritoneal membrane solute transport characteristics evaluated by peritoneal equilibration test (p = 0.12). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in survival whether the patients controlled blood sugar by diet or with insulin (p = 0.33). Cardiovascular disease and infection were the major causes of death in both groups. Although good glycemic control predicts better survival, it does not change the pattern of mortality in diabetics maintained on CAPD. CONCLUSIONS: Glycemic control before starting dialysis is a predictor of survival for type II diabetics on CAPD. Patients with poor glycemic control predialysis are associated with increased morbidity and shortened survival.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. S. Brimble, M. Walker, P. J. Margetts, K. K. Kundhal, and C. G. Rabbat
Meta-Analysis: Peritoneal Membrane Transport, Mortality, and Technique Failure in Peritoneal Dialysis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2006; 17(9): 2591 - 2598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1997 by Multimed Inc.