PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 16(Suppl_1): 410-413
1996
© 1996 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Carmona, A
Right arrow Articles by Valdes, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Carmona, A
Right arrow Articles by Valdes, F
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 16, Issue Suppl_1, S410-S413
Copyright © 1996 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Survival on chronic peritoneal dialysis: have results improved in the 1990s?

A Rodriguez-Carmona, T Garcia Falcon, M Perez Fontan, P Bouza, M Adeva, CF Rivera, and F Valdes

Servicio de Nefrologia, Hospital Juan Canalejo, A Coruna, Spain.

One hundred and seventy patients were treated with home peritoneal dialysis (PD) in our unit between 1986 and 1994. During this time lapse, several technical improvements were included in our practice. Among others there were: Swan neck permanent catheters, Y-systems, and automated home PD (APD). We reviewed our experience, to assess if these improvements had any impact on patient and technique survival, comparing patients who started PD between 1986 and 1989 (group A), with those who started PD between 1990 and 1994 (group B). Both groups had a comparable basal comorbidity, except for a higher proportion of elderly patients in group B (mean age 48 vs 58 years, p < 0.01). The incidence of peritonitis was lower in group B, while there were no differences in the rates of catheter-related infection or hospital admission. Also, there were no significant differences in patients or technique survival. The increasing presence of elderly patients in our PD unit was, apparently, determinant for the evolution of patient survival. On the other side, technical improvements had a marginal impact on technique survival. A good general PD survival in both groups, with few patients changing to hemodialysis (HD), may explain the lack of significant differences. In addition, peritonitis and inadequate PD/ultrafiltration (UF) were replaced by abdominal surgical events and social reasons as the main causes for PD failure in the second phase of the study.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1996 by Multimed Inc.